User talk:C28/Potential Candidates for POTY 2023

From LifeWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Spacefiller synth

I assume you'll add it at some point, but the spacefiller synth seems like a good canddiate. Chris857 (talk) 03:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Can we get rid of some on the list?

The following are oscillators that the first known engine or smallest of a specific period but are not new periods. It's pretty much guaranteed that the p19 and p41 will place above it, due to them being in the same category. While POTY is top three, there's also a walrus.

  • 94P53
  • 116P101
  • 72P119
  • p59 pi-heptomino hassler
  • p49 pi-heptomino hassler
  • p68 century hassler
  • p82 lumps of muck hassler
  • p78 pi-heptomino hassler
  • p93 R-pentomino hassler

Guns, sparkers, natural oscillators (i.e. Charity's p25), 42P38, and the incredibly simple and versatile 51P384 have been "saved" and are not on this list. HotdogPi (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

should i just slap them under a "various SKOPs" thingy? C28 (talk) 12:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Two categories. Some are SKOP, some are first engine. Don't mix the two. HotdogPi (talk) 12:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Stable Storage Spaceship

Stable Storage Spaceship feels like a potential candidate Evin (talk) 18:36, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://conwaylife.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:C28/Potential_Candidates_for_POTY_2023&oldid=142669"