Talk:Pufferfish

I have a question regarding a recent edit by AwesoMan3000 [1] and the revert by Codeholic [2].

A rake is defined as "a puffer whose debris consists of spaceships". By that definition, Pufferfish is not a rake, as can be seen by clicking "View animated image".

However, the page notes that there are Pufferfish-derived patterns that are rakes.

So then:

- Was the revert based on the fact that there are Pufferfish-derived rakes as stated on that page?

- If so, what is the policy on placing categories based on derivative patterns, for which the category does not apply to the original pattern?

FractalFusion (talk) 08:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

• Yes.
• There is no policy regarding that besides common sense. Codeholic (talk) 17:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)