RLE talk:Unconstructiblestilllife

Book, this is not the minimal population, albeit, that is xs306_wgg0g84s0gg39s0gg08o0kczw1c59cjic59cjic59cjic59aczg08objo65objo65objo65objog4cz11ggm6gdbgm6gdbgm6gdbgm6g08oz3201cd1qm1cd1qm1cd1qm1cd11zw359q3kc3pq3kc3pq3kc3pajozy032011y039cx321 (which I think was mentioned in one article to have been proven by another search using SAT solvers to be the minimal-population stabilisation containing the original self-forcing region), why don't we use that instead? DroneBetter (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

I think it is worth using both. Book (talk) 01:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

And this was labelled as having a minimum bounding box in this edit. While it is true, it misses the fact that there is still a smaller example in the same bounding box. GUYTU6J (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)