Problem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Haycat2009 (talk | contribs) m Replace example |
DroneBetter (talk | contribs) m add conjectures "Block array syntheses," "Finitude of spanning set of synthesis stages" (by H. H. P. M. P. Cole, formalised by me) and "Orthogonal wave speeds between c/2 and c" |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
|- class="expand-child" | |- class="expand-child" | ||
| || colspan="6" | The question "''given a still life without finite boundaries, can any MxN finite window of it be preserved within a finite still life by adding appropriate unchanging cells around it?''" remains open. It has been shown that the margin around a window needed to stabilise it might be arbitrarily large.<ref name="post86644" /> | | || colspan="6" | The question "''given a still life without finite boundaries, can any MxN finite window of it be preserved within a finite still life by adding appropriate unchanging cells around it?''" remains open. It has been shown that the margin around a window needed to stabilise it might be arbitrarily large.<ref name="post86644" /> | ||
|- | |||
| Still lifes / constructability || [[Block agar|Block array]] syntheses || '''open''' || data-sort-value=0 | ≤ 2005 || || data-sort-value=0 | — || — | |||
|- class="expand-child" | |||
| || colspan="6" | ''Can every <tt>m × n</tt> array of blocks spaced one cell apart be constructed by gliders?''<br />In {{year|2005}}, [[Jason Summers]] found a construction for <tt>2 × n</tt> block arrays.<ref name="lifenews_2005-04-20" /><br />In {{year|2015}}, [[Martin Grant]] found a construction for <tt>3 × n</tt> block arrays.<ref name="post25637" /><br />In {{year|2020}}, [[Goldtiger997]] found a construction for <tt>4 × n</tt> block arrays.<ref name="post96210" /> | |||
|- | |||
| Still lifes / constructability || Finitude of spanning set of synthesis stages || '''open''' || data-sort-value=0 | 2024 || H. H. P. M. P. Cole and DroneBetter || data-sort-value=0 | — || — | |||
|- class="expand-child" | |||
| || colspan="6" | ''Is there a pair of constants <tt>c<sub>0</sub>,c<sub>1</sub></tt>, such that for any synthesisable still life, there exists a sequence of constellations (with the last being the still life itself), such that a set of <tt>≤ c<sub>0</sub></tt> gliders may be added around the <tt>n</tt>th member to produce the <tt>n+1</tt>th, whose effect in each stage is constrained to a <tt>c<sub>1</sub> × c<sub>1</sub></tt> bounding box?''<br />Put another way, this implies that there are a finite set of forms that stages in still life syntheses may be constrained to, while still being able to construct any. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Density || [[Still life conjecture]] || solved || data-sort-value=0 | ? || ? || 1999 || [[Noam D. Elkies]] | | Density || [[Still life conjecture]] || solved || data-sort-value=0 | ? || ? || 1999 || [[Noam D. Elkies]] | ||
| Line 96: | Line 104: | ||
|- class="expand-child" | |- class="expand-child" | ||
| || colspan="6" | The question "''Does there exist an <tt>n</tt> such that a [[lightspeed bubble]] containing an empty region of any width may be constructed with height <tt>≤ n</tt>?''" was answered in the positive, with <tt>n ≤ 37</tt>.<ref name="post40615" /> | | || colspan="6" | The question "''Does there exist an <tt>n</tt> such that a [[lightspeed bubble]] containing an empty region of any width may be constructed with height <tt>≤ n</tt>?''" was answered in the positive, with <tt>n ≤ 37</tt>.<ref name="post40615" /> | ||
|- | |||
| Waves || Orthogonal wave speeds between c/2 and [[Superstring|c]] || '''open''' || data-sort-value=0 | 2023 || Keith Amling || — || — | |||
|- class="expand-child" | |||
| || colspan="6" | No such speeds are currently known. Keith disproved all other speeds of period <tt>≤ 10</tt>, but found that the partials reported for 6c/10 were surprisingly close to being complete, implying that another speed could exist.<ref name="post157503" /> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Indestructibility || The Immovable Object Problem || '''open''' || 1972 || [[John Conway]] || data-sort-value=0 | — || — | | Indestructibility || The Immovable Object Problem || '''open''' || 1972 || [[John Conway]] || data-sort-value=0 | — || — | ||
| Line 181: | Line 193: | ||
<ref name="still-life-density">{{cite web|url=https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/pstuckey/papers/still-life.pdf | title=A Complete Solution to the Maximum Density Still Life Problem | publisher=Geoffrey Chu, Peter J. Stuckey, NICTA Victoria Laboratory, Department of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Australia | date=November 8, 2013}}</ref> | <ref name="still-life-density">{{cite web|url=https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/pstuckey/papers/still-life.pdf | title=A Complete Solution to the Maximum Density Still Life Problem | publisher=Geoffrey Chu, Peter J. Stuckey, NICTA Victoria Laboratory, Department of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Australia | date=November 8, 2013}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="still-life-conjecture">{{cite web|url=https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9905194 |title=The still-Life density problem and its generalizations|author=Noam D. Elkies| accessdate=May 26, 2022| date=May 31, 1999}}</ref> | <ref name="still-life-conjecture">{{cite web|url=https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9905194 |title=The still-Life density problem and its generalizations|author=Noam D. Elkies| accessdate=May 26, 2022| date=May 31, 1999}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="lifenews_2005-04-20">{{cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160409092832/http://pentadecathlon.com/lifeNews/2005/04/block_array_constructions.html|title=Block Array Constructions|author=Heinrich Koenig|date=April 20, 2005|work=Game of Life News}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="post25637">{{LinkForumThread | |||
|format = ref | |||
|p = 25637 | |||
|title = Re: Synthesising Oscillators | |||
|author = Martin Grant | |||
|date = December 3, 2015 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="post96210">{{LinkForumThread | |||
|format = ref | |||
|p = 96210 | |||
|title = Re: Synthesising Oscillators | |||
|author = Goldtiger997 | |||
|date = May 6, 2020 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="post157503">{{LinkForumThread | |||
|format = ref | |||
|f = 2 | |||
|t = 5929 | |||
|p = 157503 | |||
|title = Re: Level wave speed limit? | |||
|author = Keith Amling | |||
|date = February 13, 2023 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
</references> | </references> | ||
Revision as of 12:56, 21 April 2024
An open problem is a problem for which no solution has been found. A current example is "What is the smallest still life that cannot be destroyed by two gliders?".
Unsolved problems can be subdivided into several basic categories:
- Periods: Do oscillators, spaceships, guns or puffers exist of a particular period?
- Unusual-growth patterns: What is the long-term effect of a predefined pattern? For example, it is unknown whether the Fermat prime calculator grows indefinitely.
- Solvable problems: Some problems are known to have a solution, but as yet no pattern has been built. For instance, until DOGun SaGaQR, no quadratic growth replicator had been constructed, but a workable blueprint was available, and no really large new technical problems would have had to be overcome to complete the construction.
- Construction and destruction problems: These include finding the smallest Garden of Eden, building a stable eater that can absorb any single glider aimed at it, determining whether a particular object has a glider synthesis, or discovering an unstoppable-growth pattern.
- Minimization problems: Find an object that satisfies some criterion that fits within a certain bounding box/minimum population. Examples include Mike Playle's prize for a small stable reflector.
- Temporal minimization problems: As above, but concentrating on speed rather than size.
List of problems
Open and previously open problems include:
| Category | Problem | Status | Year posed | Posed by | Year solved | Solved by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Description | ||||||
| Infinite growth | Replicators | solved | ? | ? | 1982 | Elwyn R. Berlekamp, John Conway, Richard K. Guy |
| The question “do replicators exist in Conway's Game of Life?” was answered in the affirmative.[1] | ||||||
| Infinite growth | Minimal-population infinite growth | solved | ? | ? | 1997 | Paul Callahan |
| The question "What is the minimum population necessary for a pattern to exhibit infinite growth?" was found to be 10 cells by an exhaustive search.[2] There are 24 such patterns, with 17 unique evolution sequences. (The equivalent question for quadratic growth is thus between 11 and 20.) | ||||||
| Infinite growth | One cell thick infinite growth | solved | ? | Nick Gotts | 1998 | Stephen Silver |
| The question “is there a one-cell-thick pattern exhibiting infinite growth?” was answered in the affirmative. | ||||||
| Still lifes | Coolout Conjecture | solved | <1992 | Richard Schroeppel | 2001 | Richard Schroeppel |
| The question “given a partial Life pattern that's internally consistent with being part of a still life (stable pattern), is there always a way to add a stabilizing boundary?” was answered in the negative. | ||||||
| Still lifes | Still life finitization problem | open | ? | Dean Hickerson | — | — |
| The question "given a still life without finite boundaries, can any MxN finite window of it be preserved within a finite still life by adding appropriate unchanging cells around it?" remains open. It has been shown that the margin around a window needed to stabilise it might be arbitrarily large.[3] | ||||||
| Still lifes / constructability | Block array syntheses | open | ≤ 2005 | — | — | |
| Can every m × n array of blocks spaced one cell apart be constructed by gliders? In 2005, Jason Summers found a construction for 2 × n block arrays.[4] In 2015, Martin Grant found a construction for 3 × n block arrays.[5] In 2020, Goldtiger997 found a construction for 4 × n block arrays.[6] | ||||||
| Still lifes / constructability | Finitude of spanning set of synthesis stages | open | 2024 | H. H. P. M. P. Cole and DroneBetter | — | — |
| Is there a pair of constants c0,c1, such that for any synthesisable still life, there exists a sequence of constellations (with the last being the still life itself), such that a set of ≤ c0 gliders may be added around the nth member to produce the n+1th, whose effect in each stage is constrained to a c1 × c1 bounding box? Put another way, this implies that there are a finite set of forms that stages in still life syntheses may be constrained to, while still being able to construct any. | ||||||
| Density | Still life conjecture | solved | ? | ? | 1999 | Noam D. Elkies |
| The question "What is the maximum density of a still life agar?" has been answered to be 12.[7] The proof requires only that no living cell has more than three living neighbours (including itself), so provides that the maximal density is ≤ 12 in all rules with survival conditions constrained to a subset of S0123. | ||||||
| Density | Oscillator conjecture | open | ? | ? | — | — |
| What is the maximum average density of an oscillating agar? The conjectured value is 12, the maximum that has been achieved. It was proven to be ≤ 813 ≈ 0.6153... on September 18, 1992,[8] which was improved to ≤ 1728 ≈ 0.6071... on December 16, 2023 by 400spartans,[9] then to ≤ 11762087 ≈ 0.5634... on January 9, 2024 by Keith Amling.[10] | ||||||
| Density | Still life density problem | solved | ? | ? | 2012 | Geoffrey Chu, Peter J. Stuckey |
| The question "What is the maximum number of cells in a still life fitting in an n × n bounding box?" has been solved. As a sequence with respect to n, after the first 60 terms, the sequence's second differences oscillate with period 54.[11] | ||||||
| Oscillators | Omniperiodicity | solved | ? | ? | 2023 | various people |
| The question “do oscillators of all periods exist?” has been answered in the affirmative. | ||||||
| Oscillators | Non-p2 phoenix | solved | ? | ? | 2024 | Adam P. Goucher, Keith Amling, Alex Greason, Stephen Silver |
| The question “Does there exist a finite oscillator of period > 2 such that no cell remains on contiguously for more than one generation?” was answered in the negative.[12] (The question for infinite agars and wicks was previously answered in the affirmative.) | ||||||
| Predecessors | Garden of Eden | solved | ? | ? | <1970 | Edward Moore |
| The existence of a Garden of Eden in Conway's Game of Life was known from the start because of a 1962 theorem by Edward Moore that guarantees their existence in a wide class of cellular automata. | ||||||
| Predecessors | Grandfather problem | solved | 1972 | John Conway | 2016 | mtve |
| The question “is there a configuration which has a father but no grandfather?” was answered in the affirmative. | ||||||
| Predecessors | Unique father problem | solved | 1972 | John Conway | 2022 | Ilkka Törmä, Ville Salo |
| The question “is there a stable configuration whose only father is itself?” was answered in the affirmative.[13] | ||||||
| Computation | Universal computer / Universal constructor | solved | ? | John Conway | 1982 | Elwyn R. Berlekamp, John Conway, Richard K. Guy |
| The question “does Conway's Game of Life support universal computation and universal construction?” was answered in the affirmative.[1] | ||||||
| Computation | Universality of predecessor-finding | solved | ? | ? | 2023 | Ville Salo and Ilkka Törmä |
| The question "can problems of finding predecessors of specific patterns be equivalent to arbitrary Boolean satisfiability problems?" was answered in the affirmative, with the corollary that the process of reversing a single iteration (or otherwise proving that a pattern is a Garden of Eden) is computationally universal.[14] | ||||||
| Circuitry | Small glider reflector / duplicator | open | 2013, 2020 | Mike Playle | — | — |
| After the discovery of the color-preserving Snark in 2013, Mike Playle offered 100 USD for a stable 90-degree colour-changing glider reflector that fits in a 25x25 bounding box and has a repeat time of 50 generations or less.[15] When the 0-degree Bandersnatch was found in 2020, he released another prize of 200 USD for a stable pattern which fits in a 25x25 bounding box, has a repeat time of 50 generations or less, and produces two output gliders that emerge in different directions and do not affect input gliders from infinity.[16] | ||||||
| Agar crawlers | Minimum speed | open | ? | ? | — | — |
| Does there exist a negative spaceship in an agar of density 12 that travels at a speed ≤ c/2? In zebra stripes, a with-the-grain agar crawler must travel at c (making it a lightspeed bubble),[17] but Hartmut Holzwart proved in 2006 that an against-the-grain agar crawler's speed is ≤ 2c/3. | ||||||
| Agar crawlers | Bound-height lightspeed bubbles | solved | ? | ? | 2017 | Arie Paap |
| The question "Does there exist an n such that a lightspeed bubble containing an empty region of any width may be constructed with height ≤ n?" was answered in the positive, with n ≤ 37.[18] | ||||||
| Waves | Orthogonal wave speeds between c/2 and c | open | 2023 | Keith Amling | — | — |
| No such speeds are currently known. Keith disproved all other speeds of period ≤ 10, but found that the partials reported for 6c/10 were surprisingly close to being complete, implying that another speed could exist.[19] | ||||||
| Indestructibility | The Immovable Object Problem | open | 1972 | John Conway | — | — |
| Does there exist a bounded pattern such that the central cell will never change state no matter what is placed outside the pattern's boundary? | ||||||
| Indestructibility | The Single-Glider-Proof Object Problem | open | ? | ? | — | — |
| Does there exist a bounded pattern such that a collision with a nonempty glider approaching from infinity (at any direction and offset) results in the glider's destruction and the pattern's eventual evolution being unaffected? | ||||||
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Berlekamp, Elwyn R.; Conway, John H.; Guy, Richard K. (2004), Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays, 4 (2nd ed.), pp. 927-961
- ↑ Nick Gotts (November 28, 2018). Systematic survey of small patterns (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ Martin Grant (December 28, 2019). Re: Unproven conjectures (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ Heinrich Koenig (April 20, 2005). "Block Array Constructions". Game of Life News.
- ↑ Martin Grant (December 3, 2015). Re: Synthesising Oscillators (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ Goldtiger997 (May 6, 2020). Re: Synthesising Oscillators (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ Noam D. Elkies (May 31, 1999). "The still-Life density problem and its generalizations". Retrieved on May 26, 2022.
- ↑ Hartmut Holzwart (June 22, 2022). Re: Can we substantiate this claim? (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ 400spartans (December 16, 2023). Re: Unproven conjectures (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ Keith Amling (January 9, 2024). Re: Unproven conjectures (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ "A Complete Solution to the Maximum Density Still Life Problem". Geoffrey Chu, Peter J. Stuckey, NICTA Victoria Laboratory, Department of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Australia (November 8, 2013).
- ↑ Adam P. Goucher (January 20, 2024), Every finite phoenix has period 2, Complex Projective 4-Space
- ↑ Ilkka Törmä (January 13, 2022). Re: Unproven conjectures (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ Ville Salo, Ilkka Törmä (August 20, 2023), Computing backwards with Game of Life, part 1: wires and circuits
- ↑ Mike Playle (April 27, 2013). Re: Just the place for a Snark! (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ Mike Playle (September 11, 2020). Re: Execution of Old Guns by Variable-Speed Firing Squad (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ Nathaniel Johnston, Dave Greene. Conway's Game of Life: Mathematics and Construction (2022), 4.5.1. (Theorem 4.2)
- ↑ Arie Paap (February 15, 2017). Re: How about searching light speed signals with various speed? (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- ↑ Keith Amling (February 13, 2023). Re: Level wave speed limit? (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
External links
- Unproven conjectures (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums
- Life has been proven omniperiodic. What next? (discussion thread) at the ConwayLife.com forums