Talk:6 bits: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
"box" the period is listed as 61! I don't know how to correct this. | "box" the period is listed as 61! I don't know how to correct this. | ||
: There's no RLE file for this pattern so I can't conveniently check the period, but how can it possibly be period 61 if it's made of pentadecathlons with period 15? So I changed it to 75. [[User:MikeP|MikeP]] 23:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | : There's no RLE file for this pattern so I can't conveniently check the period, but how can it possibly be period 61 if it's made of pentadecathlons with period 15? So I changed it to 75. [[User:MikeP|MikeP]] 23:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
==Year of discovery?== | |||
The info box says '2004', but the oscillator is included in the collection here (http://radicaleye.com/DRH/stamps.html) and the description says "''75.0.0 "glider shuttle III" [RTW 9/84]''" (at least I think they are the same oscillator)? [[User:Lewis|Lewis]] ([[User talk:Lewis|talk]]) 14:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:16, 18 September 2014
the "6 bits" page says in text that it's an oscillator of period 75, but in the "box" the period is listed as 61! I don't know how to correct this.
- There's no RLE file for this pattern so I can't conveniently check the period, but how can it possibly be period 61 if it's made of pentadecathlons with period 15? So I changed it to 75. MikeP 23:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Year of discovery?
The info box says '2004', but the oscillator is included in the collection here (http://radicaleye.com/DRH/stamps.html) and the description says "75.0.0 "glider shuttle III" [RTW 9/84]" (at least I think they are the same oscillator)? Lewis (talk) 14:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)