User talk:David: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New page: ==extraneous commentary by hvm== Could these be candidates for inclusion in the list of patterns (oscillator)? There is considerable resistance to proliferating these lists unnecessarily, ... |
→Happy birthday: new section |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Huh? Who is this? No sign in this comment...--[[User:David|David]] 10:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC) | Huh? Who is this? No sign in this comment...--[[User:David|David]] 10:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Happy birthday == | |||
If I may infer from your update this is today. All the good be with you! --[[User:Methodood|Methodood]] 20:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:59, 8 January 2010
extraneous commentary by hvm
Could these be candidates for inclusion in the list of patterns (oscillator)? There is considerable resistance to proliferating these lists unnecessarily, but there are few pages for high periods, and these two have an impressive symmetry. The period 6 oscillator has a beacon fighting a piston-scrubber combination, which could possibly be promoted into an agar or something, but in any event the preblocks confining a group of p-s's ought to be of some interest. The period 4 oscillator is so symmetric it is just plain beautiful.
Huh? Who is this? No sign in this comment...--David 10:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy birthday
If I may infer from your update this is today. All the good be with you! --Methodood 20:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)