Talk:Snacker 2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
proposed deletion |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{delete|long-settled issue}} | |||
==Merge with snacker?== | ==Merge with snacker?== | ||
Does anyone object to me merging this with [[snacker]]? I think it should probably just be listed there as an extension/alternate stabilization. [[User:Nathaniel|Nathaniel]] 19:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC) | Does anyone object to me merging this with [[snacker]]? I think it should probably just be listed there as an extension/alternate stabilization. [[User:Nathaniel|Nathaniel]] 19:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
: That seems reasonable, but I keep getting the feeling that we're already doing the same "extension as new article" thing with something else. Maybe? But anyway, yeah, having them as one article would probably be better. [[User:Elithrion|Elithrion]] 01:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC) | : That seems reasonable, but I keep getting the feeling that we're already doing the same "extension as new article" thing with something else. Maybe? But anyway, yeah, having them as one article would probably be better. [[User:Elithrion|Elithrion]] 01:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:07, 25 March 2022
|
This page may meet the criteria for deletion because of the following concern:
Please share your thoughts on this matter on this article's talk page. If you can address the above concern by improving the article, please edit this page and do so, but do not remove this notice unless at least fourteen days have passed since this tag was added and a consensus has been reached that the page should not be deleted. Moderators: check links, history and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google. |
Merge with snacker?
Does anyone object to me merging this with snacker? I think it should probably just be listed there as an extension/alternate stabilization. Nathaniel 19:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- That seems reasonable, but I keep getting the feeling that we're already doing the same "extension as new article" thing with something else. Maybe? But anyway, yeah, having them as one article would probably be better. Elithrion 01:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)