Talk:7-engine Cordership: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New page: Maybe it's my browser, but I see two red's and a green - no blue. Also it is misleading to speak of a 45 degree reflection even if it is technically true. Better to mention the conversion ... |
→Blue glider's Angle: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Maybe it's my browser, but I see two red's and a green - no blue. Also it is misleading to speak of a 45 degree reflection even if it is technically true. Better to mention the conversion to a space ship (already in the text); the discrepancy between orthogonal and diagonal explains that particular angle. I tried lefting rather than centering the figure; it looks better but the flow of text around it didn't seem optimal. Wikipedia still doesn't have the flexibility one would expect from HTML. | Maybe it's my browser, but I see two red's and a green - no blue. Also it is misleading to speak of a 45 degree reflection even if it is technically true. Better to mention the conversion to a space ship (already in the text); the discrepancy between orthogonal and diagonal explains that particular angle. I tried lefting rather than centering the figure; it looks better but the flow of text around it didn't seem optimal. Wikipedia still doesn't have the flexibility one would expect from HTML. | ||
== Blue glider's Angle == | |||
Isn't it reflected 135 degrees? | |||
Revision as of 20:09, 20 December 2009
Maybe it's my browser, but I see two red's and a green - no blue. Also it is misleading to speak of a 45 degree reflection even if it is technically true. Better to mention the conversion to a space ship (already in the text); the discrepancy between orthogonal and diagonal explains that particular angle. I tried lefting rather than centering the figure; it looks better but the flow of text around it didn't seem optimal. Wikipedia still doesn't have the flexibility one would expect from HTML.
Blue glider's Angle
Isn't it reflected 135 degrees?