Talk:One-cell-thick pattern: Difference between revisions

From LifeWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New page: ==Software== Were any of the programs used to find the unidimensional patterns ever made publicly available? ~~~~
 
m AwesoMan3000 moved page Talk:One cell thick pattern to Talk:One-cell-thick pattern: testing redirect overwriting
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
Were any of the programs used to find the unidimensional patterns ever made publicly available?
Were any of the programs used to find the unidimensional patterns ever made publicly available?
[[User:Lewis Patterson|Lewis Patterson]] 11:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
[[User:Lewis Patterson|Lewis Patterson]] 11:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
==Proposal==
I propose to rename this article to "one cell thick pattern". I think that the term "unidimensional" may lead to ambiguitity (i.e. confusion with binary, nearest-neighbor, one-dimensional automaton, also called "elementary cellular automata"). Another reason is that two dimensional patterns comprise not only two cell thick patterns but three, four, etc. cell thick. -- [[User:InfiniteGrowth|InfiniteGrowth]] 07:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
: I'm fine with that. Any other thoughts/comments from other wiki users? [[User:Nathaniel|Nathaniel]] 12:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:09, 14 December 2018

Software

Were any of the programs used to find the unidimensional patterns ever made publicly available? Lewis Patterson 11:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposal

I propose to rename this article to "one cell thick pattern". I think that the term "unidimensional" may lead to ambiguitity (i.e. confusion with binary, nearest-neighbor, one-dimensional automaton, also called "elementary cellular automata"). Another reason is that two dimensional patterns comprise not only two cell thick patterns but three, four, etc. cell thick. -- InfiniteGrowth 07:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm fine with that. Any other thoughts/comments from other wiki users? Nathaniel 12:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)