ConwayLife.com

Starting from Day 3:

unname4798 wrote: February 6th, 2025, 7:52 am

hotcrystal0 wrote: February 5th, 2025, 11:09 pm (Pure blue (#0000FF) text in parentheses is out-of-universe talk.
I think we should start using blatantly fake emails.)

To: hotcrystal0@cgol.ca, luveelvoom@example.com
From: hppmpcole@inlook.com
Subject: I got my internet back

I got my internet back, but unfortunately they only set up the weak plan, so I can only access social media sites and email sites, but not video streaming sites. I can’t even access Google to search about CA.

To: hotcrystal0@cgol.ca, luvelvoom@example.com, u4798990@odeyala.com
From: hppmpcole@inlook.com
Subject: Internet got better

I can also access other sites, only 3+ frendly ones. Unfortunately, my router broke without recover and I don't have money to buy a new router. I don't have a job.

Day 3:
I extended the number of possible outputs to 3, so there are 2^24 (16777216) rules. This is becoming high!
There are only 8! (40320) reversible rules.
I hope that there are many nice specimens of this rulespace of 40320 rules.

The definitions don't have to be well-defined, unlike in the another thread with the same name. Otherwise, the rules are the same.

someone fully following your rules wrote:day 4:
i glider hehehe inputs

removing that rule is bad, you could have just edited your 3-input post to be more well-defined.

now people can say things like the thing above and everyone will have to try and interpret what it means, like with your 3-input statement.

i announce this thread to be unofficially closed.

tommyaweosme wrote: February 15th, 2025, 10:56 pm

someone fully following your rules wrote:day 4:
i glider hehehe inputs

removing that rule is bad, you could have just edited your 3-input post to be more well-defined.

now people can say things like the thing above and everyone will have to try and interpret what it means, like with your 3-input statement.

i announce this thread to be unofficially closed.

The partitioning blocks move to the right every generation.

unname4798 wrote: February 16th, 2025, 2:10 am

tommyaweosme wrote: February 15th, 2025, 10:56 pm

someone fully following your rules wrote:day 4:
i glider hehehe inputs

removing that rule is bad, you could have just edited your 3-input post to be more well-defined.

now people can say things like the thing above and everyone will have to try and interpret what it means, like with your 3-input statement.

i announce this thread to be unofficially closed.

The partitioning blocks move to the right every generation.

sooner or later its going to become a game of understanding instead of a game of rebuilding.

also, the unnoficial close..?

-- NO ONE POST PAST THIS POINT OR ELSE YOU WILL BE IGNORED --

-- NO ONE WILL BE IGNORED PAST THIS POINT --

^^ THE ABOVE POST WILL BE IGNORED IN THE SAME WAY THAT THE MOST RECENT POST I MADE SAID ^^

edit: also, ratio. my post has 4 likes

{{[== IGNONARCE NO EXIST PAST THIS POINT! ==|}}
{{[== NO TOMMY HERE ==|}}
Please enter the secret code to unlock the secret message.

This is one of those cases where two threads called "[GAME] Building CA from the Ground Up" are definitely not better than one.

Come on, y'all -- if you find yourself getting into arguments in a Sandbox game thread, could you please simply stop contributing to that thread?

If everybody follows that rule, then grumpy moderators won't have to go around locking unpleasant-looking threads in response to post reports.