ConwayLife.com

C28 wrote: May 6th, 2021, 8:07 am

MathAndCode wrote: May 5th, 2021, 3:04 pm

hotdogPi wrote: May 5th, 2021, 2:19 pm That's quite a long name. I don't think "quadruple" is necessary unless someone finds a monomer or dimer like what happened with my p76 pi hassler.

It can simply be called the p217 U-turner hassler if you want—or in fact anything else that you want. I just felt that the felt that U-turner is singular could be misleading.

yeah that'll work.

yujh wrote: May 6th, 2021, 8:14 am Don’t want to clutter up the osc thread, made this instead

C28 wrote: May 6th, 2021, 8:07 am

MathAndCode wrote: May 5th, 2021, 3:04 pm
It can simply be called the p217 U-turner hassler if you want—or in fact anything else that you want. I just felt that the felt that U-turner is singular could be misleading.

yeah that'll work.

My suggestion: p31 hassled p217

C28 wrote: May 6th, 2021, 8:22 am

yujh wrote: May 6th, 2021, 8:14 am Don’t want to clutter up the osc thread, made this instead

C28 wrote: May 6th, 2021, 8:07 am

yeah that'll work.

My suggestion: p31 hassled p217

nah, p217 U-turner hassler is better as the pattern be hassled makes a tub then destroys it when the reaction does a full 180 when allowed to evolve on it's own.

yujh wrote: May 6th, 2021, 8:49 am

C28 wrote: May 6th, 2021, 8:22 am

yujh wrote: May 6th, 2021, 8:14 am Don’t want to clutter up the osc thread, made this instead

My suggestion: p31 hassled p217

nah, p217 U-turner hassler is better as the pattern be hassled makes a tub then destroys it when the reaction does a full 180 when allowed to evolve on it's own.

U-turner isn’t defined before, so it has unclear meaning