ConwayLife.com

1. LeapLife have a two-glider-collision that produces a sideway glider

continue

Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:55 am 1. LeapLife have a two-glider-collision that produces a sideway glider

continue

Boat is a stable eater.
Why 69?
Edit: No. nononononono. No.
Edit2: I knew about it before but wasn't sure if they had any connection. https://www.reddit.com/r/mealtimevideos ... _the_best/

Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:59 am Why 69?

Why? Because.

Edit: No. nononononono. No.

?

Edit2: I knew about it before but wasn't sure if they had any connection. https://www.reddit.com/r/mealtimevideos ... _the_best/

There were many of these threads from various forums.

Reason 3: Cleaning up blocks is of no cost.

Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 3:24 am

Edit2: I knew about it before but wasn't sure if they had any connection. https://www.reddit.com/r/mealtimevideos ... _the_best/

There were many of these threads from various forums.

No, look at the top comment there.

Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 3:24 am Reason 3: Cleaning up blocks is of no cost.

Can you show an example please?

#3 Traffic light is a p6.

Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 3:34 am

Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 3:24 am

Edit2: I knew about it before but wasn't sure if they had any connection. https://www.reddit.com/r/mealtimevideos ... _the_best/

There were many of these threads from various forums.

No, look at the top comment there.

Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 3:24 am Reason 3: Cleaning up blocks is of no cost.

Can you show an example please?

#4 Traffic light is a p6.

Re: top comment, I can't access reddit. It is blocked in china.
Re: example: Well, there's a G+block=G reaction, so there's no glider loss.
Reason 5: It have a small c/12 spaceship.

reason 6: it doesn't explode
Is this good compared to all ca, or good compared to ca people consider good? If the former, this is way easier

Moosey wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 8:37 am reason 6: it doesn't explode
Is this good compared to all ca, or good compared to ca people consider good? If the former, this is way easier

Reason 7: It has B2n, so sparks are much stronger compared to rules without it.
Not all unexplosive rules are interesting, also vice versa. LeapLife is definitely on the higher end of the interestingness spectrum in many different ways.

Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 8:48 am Not all unexplosive rules are interesting, also vice versa.

that was the joke: I meant that compared to say B234/S13456 it's fairly interesting

Reason 7 combined with Reason 4 is extremely powerful

Reason 8: It have a small knightship

(Well this was the reason I originally selected it to investigate)

Reason 9: it's not a mirrorlife relative
wait
that's a reason it isn't good
nevermind

Moosey wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 9:04 am Reason 9: it's not a mirrorlife relative
wait
that's a reason it isn't good
nevermind

Hahahahaha

I personally prefer non-mirrorlife-relatives though

mirrorlife is way 2 conduity

#9 for real: leaplife's knightship is common. <rant>frankly I think that it's kind of irritating that you've been advertising leaplife etc, particularly places like here; sure, leaplife is ok, but it's frankly not stellar enough to merit this kind of rampant advertising. tl;dr please stop advertising leaplife thx</rant>

Moosey wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 9:07 am #9 for real: leaplife's knightship is common. <rant>frankly I think that it's kind of irritating that you've been advertising leaplife etc, particularly places like here; sure, leaplife is ok, but it's frankly not stellar enough to merit this kind of rampant advertising. tl;dr please stop advertising leaplife thx</rant>

Reason 10: Unlike most rules, small methuselahs are generally easier to find than larger methuselahs.

That was a joke, and don't be Parcly Taxel or GUYTU6J thx. It's not like I'm saying "everyone investigate LeapLife" in every related or unrelated thread.

Reason #11: leaplife has a p22 or whateveryou're still bringing up leaplife where it's completely irrelevant for the sake of mentioning it