Re: B2-m3-o/S2m3-p4-m5H?
Posted: April 27th, 2020, 4:49 am
This was a spam post that I didn't notice. The post has been deleted but replies still remain. Below is the original content of this post.
Welcome to the Forums!
Interestingly, this exact rule has previously been explored a bit, check out this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4328
It's quite rare to see a rediscovery of a non-totalistic rule, so it must be a good rule, right?
EDIT:
How did I not notice.
(This is spam)
Welcome to the Forums!
Interestingly, this exact rule has previously been explored a bit, check out this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4328
It's quite rare to see a rediscovery of a non-totalistic rule, so it must be a good rule, right?
EDIT:
How did I not notice.
(This is spam)