ConwayLife.com

Posted: **October 16th, 2009, 9:39 pm**

A very simple chain of Queen Bees that produce two rows of gliders.

x = 288, y = 45, rule = B3/S23
12b2o$11bo3bo$2o8bo5bo7bo$2o8bo3bob2o4bobo$10bo5bo3b2o18b2o$11bo3bo4b
2o17bo3bo$12b2o6b2o16bo5bo7bo$22bobo13bo3bob2o4bobo$24bo13bo5bo3b2o18b
2o$39bo3bo4b2o17bo3bo$40b2o6b2o16bo5bo7bo$50bobo13bo3bob2o4bobo$52bo
13bo5bo3b2o18b2o$67bo3bo4b2o17bo3bo$68b2o6b2o16bo5bo7bo$78bobo13bo3bob
2o4bobo$80bo13bo5bo3b2o18b2o$95bo3bo4b2o17bo3bo$96b2o6b2o16bo5bo7bo$
106bobo13bo3bob2o4bobo$108bo13bo5bo3b2o18b2o$123bo3bo4b2o17bo3bo$124b
2o6b2o16bo5bo7bo$134bobo13bo3bob2o4bobo$136bo13bo5bo3b2o18b2o$151bo3bo
4b2o17bo3bo$152b2o6b2o16bo5bo7bo$162bobo13bo3bob2o4bobo$164bo13bo5bo3b
2o18b2o$179bo3bo4b2o17bo3bo$180b2o6b2o16bo5bo7bo$190bobo13bo3bob2o4bob
o$192bo13bo5bo3b2o18b2o$207bo3bo4b2o17bo3bo$208b2o6b2o16bo5bo7bo$218bo
bo13bo3bob2o4bobo$220bo13bo5bo3b2o18b2o$235bo3bo4b2o17bo3bo$236b2o6b2o
16bo5bo7bo$246bobo13bo3bob2o4bobo$248bo13bo5bo3b2o12b2o$263bo3bo4b2o
12b2o$264b2o6b2o$274bobo$276bo!

Posted: **October 19th, 2009, 12:51 pm**

Nice!

Posted: **March 4th, 2016, 4:02 pm**

Maybe, make a breeder?

Posted: **March 4th, 2016, 4:54 pm**

Maybe, stop bumping ancient threads?

Posted: **March 4th, 2016, 5:14 pm**

Maybe, make a breeder?

Unfortunately, this would require the breeder to move at slope 7, unless the wick is staggered.

Maybe, stop bumping ancient threads?

Why not? That a thread is old does not mean it should be discarded, old threads have a lot of interesting information that can be added to. Would it make any sense to lock a thread that is inactive for more than x days? No! It looks like you are one of those people who considers everything over 1 year old to be obsolete ("Ending is better than mending. The more stitches, the less riches.").

I don't think it is proper to bash someone for asking a question on an old topic, I think you owe fsrm an apology.

Posted: **March 4th, 2016, 11:05 pm**

Kiran wrote:That a thread is old does not mean it should be discarded, old threads have a lot of interesting information that can be added to. Would it make any sense to lock a thread that is inactive for more than x days? No!

Yes, it would - in fact this is exactly what most forums do. While I agree that the rule shouldn't really apply here, since Life is set up in a way that allows old threads to continue being relevant, I also don't think muzik owes anyone an apology because s/he's likely coming from other forums that follow standard practice.

Posted: **March 5th, 2016, 8:31 am**

Apologies.

I do indeed come from other forums (or at least, complete disgraces of forums absolutely overflowing with spam *cough* *cough* GEOMETRY DASH FORUMS *cough* *cough*), which generally follow the no bumping practice.

Posted: **March 5th, 2016, 8:34 am**

Is this a forum about netiquette or about GoL?

Posted: **March 5th, 2016, 8:52 am**

At the moment, pretty much both.

ConwayLife.com

Chain Gun

Chain Gun

Re: Chain Gun

Re: Chain Gun

Re: Chain Gun

Re: Chain Gun

Re: Chain Gun

Re: Chain Gun

Re: Chain Gun

Re: Chain Gun