3d Life and the Real World
Posted: January 31st, 2017, 7:00 am
Is it possible that the answer to "life, the universe and everything" is a 3D variation on Life and that while God may not play dice with the universe He does play 3D Life?
I suggest the following simple rules:
1. "Life Particles" appear and disappear at random.
2. A Life particle can only appear in a space unoccupied by another particle.
3. A Life particle can only disappear from where a particle is.
4. "Life Space" acts like a fluid. For example, place a ball in a swimming pool containing other balls and the nearest balls are pushed further away from it to a greater extent than those at a distance. I believe this results in an inverse square law. Similarly removing the ball has an attraction effect.
The above rules do not factor in rotation and a different set probably apply at subatomic levels, but lets see what the results would be.
The random nature means inevitably that some particles will appear close to others and clusters will form. The clusters will grow and eventually become large enough for particles to disappear from the cluster attracting other nearby particles and clusters.
Life Space is vast compared to that occupied by particles and the appearance of a single particle would be virtually undetectable. The cummulative effect would be detectable. The result would be that galaxy sized clusters would not be "accelerating away from each other" but accelerating away from the spaces between them!
The random nature of the above means that the Life Space equivalents of a Big Bang, a Steady State, a succession of Big Bangs and total annihilation are all possible and could all occur over time.
Given the current speed and storage capacity of PCs these days and the minimal programming which would be required I imagine that something like this has been done. I will be fascinated to hear of any results.
Andy Jenkinson
I suggest the following simple rules:
1. "Life Particles" appear and disappear at random.
2. A Life particle can only appear in a space unoccupied by another particle.
3. A Life particle can only disappear from where a particle is.
4. "Life Space" acts like a fluid. For example, place a ball in a swimming pool containing other balls and the nearest balls are pushed further away from it to a greater extent than those at a distance. I believe this results in an inverse square law. Similarly removing the ball has an attraction effect.
The above rules do not factor in rotation and a different set probably apply at subatomic levels, but lets see what the results would be.
The random nature means inevitably that some particles will appear close to others and clusters will form. The clusters will grow and eventually become large enough for particles to disappear from the cluster attracting other nearby particles and clusters.
Life Space is vast compared to that occupied by particles and the appearance of a single particle would be virtually undetectable. The cummulative effect would be detectable. The result would be that galaxy sized clusters would not be "accelerating away from each other" but accelerating away from the spaces between them!
The random nature of the above means that the Life Space equivalents of a Big Bang, a Steady State, a succession of Big Bangs and total annihilation are all possible and could all occur over time.
Given the current speed and storage capacity of PCs these days and the minimal programming which would be required I imagine that something like this has been done. I will be fascinated to hear of any results.
Andy Jenkinson