Then how is my post rate too high when it is close to your current post rate and below your post rate when you were newer?yujh wrote: October 2nd, 2020, 9:56 pmUmm, I make 6.9 posts every day.
you make 7.(a long time ago I make 10 posts every day)
I know that I was wrongMathAndCode wrote: October 2nd, 2020, 10:58 pmThen how is my post rate too high when it is close to your current post rate and below your post rate when you were newer?yujh wrote: October 2nd, 2020, 9:56 pmUmm, I make 6.9 posts every day.
you make 7.(a long time ago I make 10 posts every day)
Heh, you're right. But at the same time, I wonder what I was even thinking back then.MathAndCode wrote: October 2nd, 2020, 12:30 pmThe important part is that you're improving. Any rate of improvement, if sustained, will eventually close any gap. Use the fact that you have already improved to motivate yourself further.wwei23 wrote: October 1st, 2020, 11:21 pm Whenever I see my 2017 posts, I wonder who this person (AKA me) was, and how he could possible be so immature.
(2pi)/pi isn't irrationalPC101 wrote: October 4th, 2020, 4:51 pm "Everyone is irrational, because when you divide someone by an irrational number, you get an irrational number"
- Irrational thought
You can't divide a person by a number.
That's part of why it's irrational.
Here, I fixed your methuselah.MathAndCode wrote: October 4th, 2020, 10:50 pm
Edit: b3o$o2bo$2o2bo$b2obo is close but should have one or two (preferably two) more blinkers.
Code: Select all
9bo8boo$8bobo7bo$9boo8bo$18boo22$booo$obbo$oobbo$boobo!samewwei23 wrote: October 1st, 2020, 11:21 pm Whenever I see my 2017 posts, I wonder who this person (AKA me) was, and how he could possible be so immature.
Thank you for your effort and dedication. However, I'd argue that that's too contrived to count. In general, I feel that constructed methuselahs shouldn't count for anything. For example, here's a methuselah that lasts for over 50,000 generations that I would argue is obviously contrived and shouldn't count for any longevity records.wwei23 wrote: October 4th, 2020, 11:08 pmHere, I fixed your methuselah.Code: Select all
9bo8boo$8bobo7bo$9boo8bo$18boo22$booo$obbo$oobbo$boobo!
Code: Select all
x = 312, y = 199, rule = B3/S23
311bo$311bo$311bo21$234b3o17$101b3o3$237bo$237bo$237bo5$254b3o$243b3o10bo$256bo$255bo13$o$o$o41$72b2o$72bo86$54bo$54bo$54bo!Code: Select all
x=11, y=7, rule=B3/S2
ooo$bbboo$bbbobo$bbbbbo$bbbbbobo$bbbbbboo$bbbbbbbbooo!Methuselahs are trivial once you allow for an arbitrary large bounding box. The reason is obvious.MathAndCode wrote: October 5th, 2020, 10:09 amThank you for your effort and dedication. However, I'd argue that that's too contrived to count. In general, I feel that constructed methuselahs shouldn't count for anything. For example, here's a methuselah that lasts for over 50,000 generations that I would argue is obviously contrived and shouldn't count for any longevity records.wwei23 wrote: October 4th, 2020, 11:08 pmHere, I fixed your methuselah.Code: Select all
9bo8boo$8bobo7bo$9boo8bo$18boo22$booo$obbo$oobbo$boobo!I started with 40514M, which was in turn obtained by doing the same thing with 32829M, which shows that the methuselah that I posted doesn't exactly rely on luck in the same way that proper methuselahs do.Code: Select all
x = 312, y = 199, rule = B3/S23 311bo$311bo$311bo21$234b3o17$101b3o3$237bo$237bo$237bo5$254b3o$243b3o10bo$256bo$255bo13$o$o$o41$72b2o$72bo86$54bo$54bo$54bo!
Exactly. That's one of the reasons why constructed methuselahs shouldn't count.wzkchem5 wrote: October 8th, 2020, 5:49 amMethuselahs are trivial once you allow for an arbitrary large bounding box. The reason is obvious.
Code: Select all
x = 5, y = 5, rule = B3-kq4j/S2-i34q
bo$obo$bobo$2bobo$3bo!
#C [[ ZOOM 64.0 ]]
Code: Select all
x = 10, y = 10, rule = B3-kq4j/S2-i34q
2b2o$2b2o$2o2b2o$2o2b2o$2b2o2b2o$2b2o2b2o$4b2o2b2o$4b2o2b2o$6b2o$6b2o!
I was confused for a while before I realized that the second pattern was inflated.goldenratio wrote: October 8th, 2020, 3:51 pmCode: Select all
x = 5, y = 5, rule = B3-kq4j/S2-i34q bo$obo$bobo$2bobo$3bo! #C [[ ZOOM 64.0 ]]Code: Select all
x = 10, y = 10, rule = B3-kq4j/S2-i34q 2b2o$2b2o$2o2b2o$2o2b2o$2b2o2b2o$2b2o2b2o$4b2o2b2o$4b2o2b2o$6b2o$6b2o!
Me too!MathAndCode wrote: October 8th, 2020, 5:35 pmI was confused for a while before I realized that the second pattern was inflated.goldenratio wrote: October 8th, 2020, 3:51 pmCode: Select all
x = 5, y = 5, rule = B3-kq4j/S2-i34q bo$obo$bobo$2bobo$3bo! #C [[ ZOOM 64.0 ]]Code: Select all
x = 10, y = 10, rule = B3-kq4j/S2-i34q 2b2o$2b2o$2o2b2o$2o2b2o$2b2o2b2o$2b2o2b2o$4b2o2b2o$4b2o2b2o$6b2o$6b2o!
How can one set the grid lines to show in the RLE code?yujh wrote: October 9th, 2020, 5:53 amMe too!MathAndCode wrote: October 8th, 2020, 5:35 pmI was confused for a while before I realized that the second pattern was inflated.
Do You mean this?MathAndCode wrote: October 9th, 2020, 9:53 amHow can one set the grid lines to show in the RLE code?yujh wrote: October 9th, 2020, 5:53 amMe too!MathAndCode wrote: October 8th, 2020, 5:35 pmI was confused for a while before I realized that the second pattern was inflated.
Yes.yujh wrote: October 9th, 2020, 9:57 amDo You mean this?MathAndCode wrote: October 9th, 2020, 9:53 amHow can one set the grid lines to show in the RLE code?