Page 3 of 10

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 7:25 am
by dvgrn
@Hubi1857, escalation of a pointless argument with silly profanity is definitely not welcome even in the Sandbox. I've deleted the reported post. Please don't create work for the moderators unnecessarily; spam cleanup is enough of a bother as it is.

The general pattern around here is that if you start nominating people for the W.C. Fields medal, you automatically receive one.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 7:49 am
by Hubi1857
dvgrn wrote: January 12th, 2020, 7:25 am @Hubi1857, escalation of a pointless argument with silly profanity is definitely not welcome even in the Sandbox.
You won't stop bothering me before I stop posting, am I right?

Repair my damaged thread ASAP, before I complain to site adminstrator nathaniel about you damaging my thread!

Hubi :evil:

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 8:24 am
by Moosey
I said I would leave, but I would like to explain:
1) You may have started this thread, but you do not own this forum thread.
And
2) Good luck getting Nathaniel to do something about the fact that profanity was deleted on this forum, which I believe has a rule against profanity.

As you really hate me (I can tell because I read your profane post) for explaining that you have posted the wrong evolution (that is, phases) of the glider, I shall leave.

Au Revoir

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 8:32 am
by Hubi1857
Back to topic
Hubi1857 wrote: January 11th, 2020, 10:10 am Back to Max Planck, cellular automata and the phases of the moving p4 oscillator that is Conways glider.

Code: Select all

..o...o.....o..o.o
o.o....oo.o.o...oo
.oo...oo...oo...o.
This is my very first working pattern for Conways "Game of Life", a phalanx of four pentominos, one for each phase of the glider, which peacefully travel together in sync.

And as it's proud discoverer I have the legitimate claim to call it

phalanx

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 9:58 am
by testitemqlstudop
Hubi1857 wrote: January 12th, 2020, 7:49 am
dvgrn wrote: January 12th, 2020, 7:25 am @Hubi1857, escalation of a pointless argument with silly profanity is definitely not welcome even in the Sandbox.
You won't stop bothering me before I stop posting, am I right?

Repair my damaged thread ASAP, before I complain to site adminstrator nathaniel about you damaging my thread!

Hubi :evil:
ok boomer

le's see how nanthaniel deals with your disrespect

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 10:54 am
by Moosey
testitemqlstudop wrote: January 12th, 2020, 9:58 am
Hubi1857 wrote: January 12th, 2020, 7:49 am
dvgrn wrote: January 12th, 2020, 7:25 am @Hubi1857, escalation of a pointless argument with silly profanity is definitely not welcome even in the Sandbox.
You won't stop bothering me before I stop posting, am I right?

Repair my damaged thread ASAP, before I complain to site adminstrator nathaniel about you damaging my thread!

Hubi :evil:
ok boomer

le's see how nanthaniel deals with your disrespect
Don't taunt him
He'll get very mad at you
Do you want him to swear at you?

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 12:02 pm
by Hubi1857
No, Moosey, I do not hate you, I just do not know you.

Don't expect me to apologize for things which are definitely not my fault and we'll have no problem with each other in the future.

If it's a little solace for you here another famous quote of Lou Reed, ripped off the song "European Son" from the famous album "The Velvet Underground & Nico", the worst engineered Rock'n'Roll album of all times, produced by Andy Warhol some 50 years ago:


You killed your european son
You spit on those under twenty one

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 3:12 pm
by Hdjensofjfnen
Hubi1857 wrote: January 12th, 2020, 4:10 am
Hdjensofjfnen wrote: January 12th, 2020, 3:19 am
You're shaping up to be more annoying of a user than Entity Valkyrie. And that's not a good sign. Plus, threads are generally made to be posted in by everyone; Moosey is not at fault for discussing the thread's subject within its appropriate thread.
I don't know what happened to Entity Valkyrie but I have no problem with Entity Valkyrie 2. Plus, threads are usually created, designed or opened, name it as you like, by a single, ordinary user, as arrogant, annoying and irrelevant, as you please.
It is your fault to discuss my thread's subject within the completely unappropriate context of the Sandbox.
How is that my fault? This was in the Sandbox in the first place.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 3:14 pm
by Hdjensofjfnen
Hdjensofjfnen wrote: January 12th, 2020, 3:12 pm
Hubi1857 wrote: January 12th, 2020, 4:10 am
Hdjensofjfnen wrote: January 12th, 2020, 3:19 am
You're shaping up to be more annoying of a user than Entity Valkyrie. And that's not a good sign. Plus, threads are generally made to be posted in by everyone; Moosey is not at fault for discussing the thread's subject within its appropriate thread.
I don't know what happened to Entity Valkyrie but I have no problem with Entity Valkyrie 2. Plus, threads are usually created, designed or opened, name it as you like, by a single, ordinary user, as arrogant, annoying and irrelevant, as you please.
It is your fault to discuss my thread's subject within the completely unappropriate context of the Sandbox.
How is that my fault? This was in the Sandbox in the first place.
EDIT:
Hubi1857 wrote: January 12th, 2020, 7:49 am
dvgrn wrote: January 12th, 2020, 7:25 am @Hubi1857, escalation of a pointless argument with silly profanity is definitely not welcome even in the Sandbox.
You won't stop bothering me before I stop posting, am I right?

Repair my damaged thread ASAP, before I complain to site adminstrator nathaniel about you damaging my thread!

Hubi :evil:
dvgrn (Dave Greene) is a moderator. It's his job to erase instances of profanity on the forums.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 4:02 pm
by Hubi1857
No comment.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 12th, 2020, 8:21 pm
by Hubi1857
testitemqlstudop wrote: January 12th, 2020, 9:58 am
ok boomer

le's see how nanthaniel deals with your disrespect
Hey! I am 50 years older than Moosey, you and Hdjensofjfnen!

And I am completely unable to deal with your disrespect towards me, since you haven't got the faintest idea what the word "respect" might mean.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 2:53 am
by Heavpoot
Hubi1857 wrote: January 12th, 2020, 8:32 am Back to topic
Hubi1857 wrote: January 11th, 2020, 10:10 am Back to Max Planck, cellular automata and the phases of the moving p4 oscillator that is Conways glider.

Code: Select all

..o...o.....o..o.o
o.o....oo.o.o...oo
.oo...oo...oo...o.
This is my very first working pattern for Conways "Game of Life", a phalanx of four pentominos, one for each phase of the glider, which peacefully travel together in sync.

And as it's proud discoverer I have the legitimate claim to call it

phalanx
this is pretty revolutionary guys, can we get a 4G synthesis of this? requesting that dvgrn moves this to the CGOL topic for this amazing discovery alone

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 5:50 am
by GUYTU6J
Heavpoot wrote: January 13th, 2020, 3:03 am One of the greatest Cellular Automata minds we have on this server, Hubi1857, has posted something highly important. This proves 2 things:
Hubi1857 wrote: January 11th, 2020, 10:10 am Back to Max Planck, cellular automata and the phases of the moving p4 oscillator that is Conways glider.

Code: Select all

..o...o.....o..o.o
o.o....oo.o.o...oo
.oo...oo...oo...o.
1. Spaceships are not strictly spaceships, but "moving oscillators". A p1 spaceship is now to be referred to as a "moving still life".

2. The "phalnax" (pattern described in the code block) is clearly the most important object to synthesize, not these silly still lives! I think we could get a 6G synthesis or if we even try, 5G synthesis.

Clearly with Hubi1857 on this forum, there is no point even doing CA research. I mean look at us, using terms from biology to describe things!
@Heavpoot, the great mind belongs to this very dedicated thread. Nowhere else deserves the honour.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 6:28 am
by Hubi1857
GUYTU6J wrote: January 13th, 2020, 5:50 am @Heavpoot, the great mind belongs to this very dedicated thread. Nowhere else deserves the honour.
Pleased (and eased) that we are back on topic.

Yours,
Hubi :)

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 6:38 am
by GUYTU6J
Hubi1857 wrote: January 13th, 2020, 6:28 am
GUYTU6J wrote: January 13th, 2020, 5:50 am @Heavpoot, the great mind belongs to this very dedicated thread. Nowhere else deserves the honour.
Pleased (and eased) that we are back on topic.

Yours,
Hubi :)
You should reply me in the PMs, not here temporarily.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 6:43 am
by Hubi1857
Sorry, but hiding in privacy won't solve any of my real world problems with the local authorities and bureaucrats in Berlin-Kreuzberg.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 7:21 am
by GUYTU6J
Neither will hinding your ideas from me solve that.
Waste no more time!

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 7:42 am
by Moosey
Hubi1857 wrote: January 12th, 2020, 12:02 pm No, Moosey, I do not hate you, I just do not know you.

Don't expect me to apologize for things which are definitely not my fault and we'll have no problem with each other in the future.
How is you swearing at me not your fault?

P.S.
Hubi1857 wrote: January 12th, 2020, 8:21 pm Hey! I am 50 years older than Moosey, [testitemqlstudop] and Hdjensofjfnen!

And I am completely unable to deal with your disrespect towards me, since you haven't got the faintest idea what the word "respect" might mean.
I don't know when you learned what "respect" meant, but I'm fairly sure I learnt it several years ago.

Sometimes you don't respect the people who greatly disrespect you.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 8:05 am
by Hubi1857
GUYTU6J wrote: January 13th, 2020, 7:21 am Neither will hinding your ideas from me solve that.
Waste no more time!
Never heard of the word "hinding", not even my translator app knows it.

What does it mean?

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 8:21 am
by Hubi1857
Moosey wrote: January 13th, 2020, 7:42 am
I don't know when you learned what "respect" meant, but I'm fairly sure I learnt it several years ago.

Sometimes you don't respect the people who greatly disrespect you.
I know what respect means ever since I was several years younger than you.

Very often you respect someones work although you disrespect the person.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 8:49 am
by testitemqlstudop
I know what respect means, and as I discern your flippancy of me, such concern is expeditiously reciprocated.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 10:10 am
by 83bismuth38
Hubi1857 wrote: January 13th, 2020, 6:43 am Sorry, but hiding in privacy won't solve any of my real world problems with the local authorities and bureaucrats in Berlin-Kreuzberg.
I'm sorry, but i just have to comment on this.
how on earth will posting about cellular automaton solve those problems? shouldn't you, y'know, work it out in real life? obviously, i have no idea what your real life is like, but i highly doubt insulting people online will solve it. also, what the heck is a "phantastrophysicist?" i've never heard of that before, and my translator doesn't say anything. what does it mean?

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 11:00 am
by Hubi1857
83bismuth38 wrote: January 13th, 2020, 10:10 am
I'm sorry, but i just have to comment on this.
how on earth will posting about cellular automaton solve those problems? shouldn't you, y'know, work it out in real life? obviously, i have no idea what your real life is like, but i highly doubt insulting people online will solve it. also, what the heck is a "phantastrophysicist?" i've never heard of that before, and my translator doesn't say anything. what does it mean?
1.Posting about cellular automata won't solve any real world problem.
2. I work in real life, but I am unable to earn a living with my music because I'm yet another lunatic here am Zickenplatz im Graefekiez in Kreuzberg in Berlin/G€rmany on planet earth.
3. A phantastrophysicist is a scientist who works on phantastrophysics.

So this single, simple question remains from the topic of this very thread of the forum

What is phantastrophysics?

Well, phantastrophysics is a branch of theoretical physics which unites the cosmology of Jim Peebles with high energy particle physics as it is performed @CERN in Switzerland.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 12:03 pm
by Hubi1857
Hubi1857 wrote: January 13th, 2020, 11:00 am Well, phantastrophysics is a branch of theoretical physics
Sorry, phantastrophysics is not a just a branch of theoretical physics but rather the root of physics as such.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 13th, 2020, 3:35 pm
by Hubi1857
Sharpening the point of my very first thread for the Conway, Mandelbrot and Hilbert addicts who populate this forum until it's as sharp as a single point of the Cantor dust of the fractals called "Julia set" on the plane of complex numbers:

Astrophysicists tell you that nothing in nature comes closer to a single point in mathematics than a single star of the Andromeda galaxy as seen from planet earth with a telescope while theoretical physicists teach you that this honor belongs to the elementary particle commonly called "electron".

I am a phantastrophysicist, a skillful mathematical physicist, who works on the unification of the cosmology of Jim Peebles with the high energy particle physics as it's performed @CERN in Switzerland.

I hope that erases any of your concerns about my so called "insults" to members of this forum and helps @Moosey to see that he is not the most promising candidate anymore for the very first W.C.Fields medal in the history of mathematics.

@83bismuth38: Thanx for your most constructive contribution to this thread.


Hi, I'm Hubi, pleased to post you!