x = 27, y = 31, rule = B3/S23
19bo$17b3o$16bo$16b2o9$11bo$10b3o$12b2o3$2b2o$bobo$bo$2o8$25b2o$24b2o
$26bo!
However, I don't think that the glider can be replaced by a stable catalyst (although I could be wrong), so the most likely solution is finding a dirty century-making conduit whose junk annihilates the region behind the switch engine.
Last edited by MathAndCode on April 1st, 2021, 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MathAndCode wrote: February 11th, 2021, 11:28 pmHowever, as far as I know, switch engines are pretty uncommon.
I apparently underestimated the likelihood of one showing up...
Switch engines are fairly common, as any Catagolue census can tell you. But it's annoyingly rare for a really edgy one to show up, that can sneak into a swimmer lane without damaging anything. Both of the eater catalysts in your century-to-switch-engine conversion get in the way of swimmer-lane catalysts:
x = 42, y = 53, rule = LifeHistory
14.2A$13.A.A$14.A6$22.2A$21.A.A$22.A6$30.2A$29.A.A$30.A3$.A$A.A31.D$
2A30.3D$31.D$31.2D$29.4B$19.B7.4B$18.2BA3.8B$9.A8.2B4A8B$8.A.A5.4BA3B
A6B$8.2A6.16B$16.6B3A7B$17.10B2A4B$18.8BD6B$19.6BD2C4B$19.8B2D3B$17.A
15B$16.A.A13B$16.ACDB.4B.5B$16.D.DB3.B4.4B$16.D11.5B$15.2D13.4B$31.4B
$32.4B$33.4B$34.4B$35.4B$36.4B$37.4B$38.2B2D$39.2DB$40.BD!
Still, any result like this seems like good progress -- it's nice to know that simple conversions are out there, even if they currently need some sacrificial junk to work properly:
dvgrn wrote: February 24th, 2021, 5:09 pmSwitch engines are fairly common, as any Catagolue census can tell you.
According to this post, switch engines are about 0.13% as common as R-sequences. Are there other known dirty conduits that make them?
Heh, I didn't say they were really common, just fairly common... I don't remember seeing any elementary conduits that produce any kind of a switch engine, let alone a clean one. This conduit of yours is breaking new ground, or it would be if it didn't need that extra glider support.
Jormungant wrote: March 10th, 2021, 8:35 pm
Here is some extra space ^^, even though that does not make a valid connection (I have been wanting to use that trick for some time ^^)
wwei47 wrote: March 23rd, 2021, 12:09 pmCan that glider be used to delete the beehive?
Reflecting it with a boojum or rectifier would turn the beehive into a honey farm. There might be some more complicated mechanism, but it would likely add a lot to the repeat time, so unless someone finds a new 180° reflector, our best chance is finding a different mechanism.
MathAndCode wrote: March 23rd, 2021, 12:22 pm
Reflecting it with a boojum or rectifier would turn the beehive into a honey farm. There might be some more complicated mechanism, but it would likely add a lot to the repeat time, so unless someone finds a new 180° reflector, our best chance is finding a different mechanism.
Try poking it with a messy B or H-creating conduit? A pair of Snarks?
EvinZL wrote: March 23rd, 2021, 12:58 pmIt looks like a spartan version of another of your partials (the one with the r49 catalyst)
Ah, yes. Thank you for reminding me. The R49 catalyst also does the same thing as the transparent block reaction in wwei23's partial, with the same leftover beehive.
MathAndCode wrote: April 1st, 2021, 3:55 pm
I think that this W->G is new. The glider may look like the default glider output, but it's two lanes off.
Sure seems to be new. Might be hard to attach anything to it, though. (?) The QF*138W works fine, but then the usual thing is to start with a pi to get a Q, and those catalysts get in the way of the glider output.
I guess at least there's a new G1 output based on HF135Q. That's getting to be mighty slow to recover and not-small, though:
x = 8, y = 5, rule = B3/S23
2bo$b3o$o2bo$obo3b2o$bo4b2o!
[[ STOP 14 ]]
However, the block can't be inserted directly, and it doesn't output anything anyway, so it wouldn't be useful in a self-constructing spaceship. It's at least theoretically possible that the block could be replaced with some junk so that the sparks left behind settled into the same junk instead of dying, but technology isn't powerful enough yet for searching for asymmetric period-fourteen spaceships (or at least beyond an impractically narrow width). Of course, it might be possible to modify the conduit to suppress the block, which would result in a QF*124W conduit, but that would make the output clearance even worse.
MathAndCode wrote: April 18th, 2021, 3:57 pm
I have attached the latest version of my draft of the Elementary Conduits Collection. When are we going to get around to formally updating it?
Whenever someone feels motivated to update it, which is to say, never (until further notice).
TBH I'd see the point in having two copies of the ECC, the original and a more fully-developed version containing less fully-developed conduits (that phrase lol), because it's helpful to have a collection of conduits that are reasonably useful in circuitry separate from the rest.
Each day is a hidden opportunity, a frozen waterfall that's waiting to be realised, and one that I'll probably be ignoring
sonata wrote:July 2nd, 2020, 8:33 pmconwaylife signatures are amazing[citation needed]