ConwayLife.com

Posted: **June 14th, 2019, 4:59 pm**

A kitty who is fluffy

fluffykitty wrote:Someone who still hasn't joined the Googology Discord server for some reason (invite link)

I don’t have discord nor an account

I will at some point

Posted: **June 14th, 2019, 6:08 pm**

Someone who joined the Googology Discord server for some reason (invite link)

Posted: **June 14th, 2019, 6:34 pm**

Someone who decided to advertise the Googology Discord server for some reason

Posted: **June 14th, 2019, 6:40 pm**

Someone who may or may not have joined the Googology Discord

Posted: **June 14th, 2019, 6:59 pm**

Someone who is correct with the latter (AKA "may not have") part of his or her statement.

Posted: **June 14th, 2019, 7:58 pm**

Someone who may or may not know that:

If you imply that someone (x) or does/is/ate/etc not (x) they will usually tell you which in the next post
This is a simple way to say whatever you want in this thread without technically violating the rules
The second invite link I posted doesn't actually go anywhere useful
If you omit the initial [*] tag in a list the first element lacks a bullet point

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 12:40 am**

Someone who found a loophole in the rules.

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 12:59 am**

Someone who won't tell the mods if they value their idk

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 2:22 am**

fluffykitty wrote:Someone who won't tell the mods if they value their idk

I...have no idea if I do.

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 7:16 am**

Someone who may exist and may (or may not) know that

Γ_0=the first a such that a=Φ_a(0)
1+w=w<w+1
I’m writing with bullet points
Iff dvgrn is online, spam gets deleted

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 8:05 am**

Someone who might have children in the future.

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 10:56 am**

Someone omnipresent here

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 11:41 am**

A person whose name is gustone

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 3:42 pm**

Someone who didn't use the word "someone" in their post

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 10:21 pm**

I think that, here, the word “someone” is useless, so let’s omit it.

that pointed out that Moosey used an alternative.

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 10:22 pm**

that started the omitting.

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 10:24 pm**

Moosey wrote:Someone who may exist and may (or may not) know that

Γ_0=the first a such that a=Φ_a(0)

1+w=w<w+1

I’m writing with bullet points

Iff dvgrn is online, spam gets deleted

1. No
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Yes
5. weirder and weirder and weirder and I didn’t expect it to wait this long.

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 10:24 pm**

that answered instead of describing himself.

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 10:25 pm**

that made a thread they doesn’t know if they should delete.

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 10:25 pm**

that is posting in a chain.

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 10:57 pm**

Someone who is relatively crazy.

Posted: **June 15th, 2019, 11:43 pm**

who broke the chain of "Someone" omission.

Posted: **June 16th, 2019, 12:30 am**

Someone who is described by me

Posted: **June 16th, 2019, 12:38 am**

A person who is breaking the omission of the word that consists of the words meaning "a few" and "the number before two".

Posted: **June 16th, 2019, 7:55 am**

A person who may or may not eat lunch today/tomorrow

ConwayLife.com

Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell

Re: Above user in a nutshell