ConwayLife.com

This thread is so meta, even this acronym. (link to xkcd.com)

Someone who broke the rules

Someone who created a reasonably simple thread which started to get weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and

weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and 日 and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder

weirder and weirder as it goes on.

A user who described his previous post in a nutshell rather than himself.

PkmnQ wrote:Someone who created a reasonably simple thread which started to get weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and weirder and

Someone who is not describing the person above them

next person wrote:Someone who is a hypocrite

Someone who has a ridiculously long name.

Wait the word ridiculously is already long enough.

Someone who probably doesn't have hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia

Someone who probably doesn't have 666phobia - I'm just too lazy to type the whole word.

Someone who is too ponylated and has become an Equestrated user (yes that is intended to sound like chemical terms)

Someone who is staying up playing mobile phone late regardless of the emergency of the upcoming exam

Someone who welcomes people to share ideas about the etymology of names!

Someone who has a link to a weird game related to the TREE function in his signature, and is waiting to see if anyone can tell whether he successfully beat TREE(3) (and if I did, is matrixparty(n) the fastest-growing function conceived by a 12-year-old?)

EDIT later than the rest of this post:
NOPE, I didn’t

Speaking of ages, it would be funny if you could enter you birth date as text—
Johansson was born on 4 July, 2005 -, as we speak.
Because then his age according to the forums would be

some absurd hypothetical forum wrote:13, as we speak.

Someone who replied before Hunting notices my reply for which (s)he may not actually read it.

Someone who replied to me with a description.


Also, looking back at older parts of the thread,

bidibangboom wrote:8 times

This wasn’t legal by the rules of this thread!

Someone who doesn’t have a lot of ways to describe anymore.

Someone who is either lying, being lazy, or not following the spirit of this thread (INCLUSIVE OR)

Someone who probably Twidashs

Someone with 1001 posts (at time of writing)

Someone who frequently discusses mathematics in the Sandbox

Someone who doesn't

Someone who almost accidentally double posted but then did so intentionally

Someone who frequently discusses mathematics with me in the sandbox

Someone who still hasn't joined the Googology Discord server for some reason (invite link)