Page 15 of 18

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 3:07 am
by Hunting
Going to read the transcripts later.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 3:07 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 3:03 am I don't think so.
Should we have other particles?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 3:15 am
by fluffykitty
Maybe, if we can figure out what they would do.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 3:24 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 3:15 am Maybe, if we can figure out what they would do.
What kind of meanings would they have? The Wikipedia page on particles has a whole part on Turkish particles. It says they have no meaning on their own, but to me it doesn't seem like that. Maybe we could use some meanings from those?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 3:34 am
by fluffykitty
If you can think of anything, then go ahead. Also, there's a list of example sentences here which tests a lot of grammatical features. We should try to translate those.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 3:37 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 3:34 am If you can think of anything, then go ahead. Also, there's a list of example sentences here which tests a lot of grammatical features. We should try to translate those.
I noticed that a lot of those sentences use adverbs. We should try and make them. We already have converb adverbs, but we also need a way to make them from adjectives.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 4:23 am
by fluffykitty
Yep. Does <-amo> sound good?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 4:25 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:23 am Yep. Does <-amo> sound good?
Yes, though do we even have any adjectives yet?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 4:29 am
by fluffykitty
...uh...how about <zlink> "gooey"?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 4:37 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:29 am ...uh...how about <zlink> "gooey"?
Ok.
<kafma> <slow>
<lesni> <fast>
<bylk> <big>
<tysef> <small>
<zlinkamo> <gooeyly>
Is <gooeyly> even a word?
How did we not even think of adjectives until now?
Edit: I don't think <bylk> works, so if it doesn't then it is <bysk>.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 4:52 am
by Hunting
<rank> - good

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 4:54 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
Hunting wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:52 am <rank> - good
Ok then edible is also <rank>.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 4:54 am
by Hunting
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:54 am
Hunting wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:52 am <rank> - good
Ok then edible is also <rank>.
Why do they share a word?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 4:57 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
Hunting wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:54 am
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:54 am Ok then edible is also <rank>.
Why do they share a word?
fluffykitty wrote: November 15th, 2020, 6:15 am If we're moving on to syntax and stuff, here's some things I think we should do:
  • Make the word for "good" the same as the word for "edible" (and maybe have more food metaphors while we're at it)
  • SOV word order
  • Split case marking across determiner and noun (like in German)
  • Use auxiliary verbs
  • Allow omission of subject pronouns by marking person and number on verbs
  • Sandhi with grammatical affixes
  • Affixes for deriving agent nouns and similar from verbs (eg English "-er", "-ee", but for more arguments like "receiver", "tool", "source", etc)

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 5:01 am
by Hunting
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:57 am
Hunting wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:54 am
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:54 am Ok then edible is also <rank>.
Why do they share a word?
fluffykitty wrote: November 15th, 2020, 6:15 am If we're moving on to syntax and stuff, here's some things I think we should do:
  • Make the word for "good" the same as the word for "edible" (and maybe have more food metaphors while we're at it)
  • SOV word order
  • Split case marking across determiner and noun (like in German)
  • Use auxiliary verbs
  • Allow omission of subject pronouns by marking person and number on verbs
  • Sandhi with grammatical affixes
  • Affixes for deriving agent nouns and similar from verbs (eg English "-er", "-ee", but for more arguments like "receiver", "tool", "source", etc)
Why js it so though?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 5:03 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
Hunting wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 5:01 am Why js it so though?
I have absolutely no idea.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 3rd, 2020, 2:08 am
by fluffykitty
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 5:01 am
Hunting wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 5:03 am Why js it so though?
I have absolutely no idea.
It's funnier that way.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 3rd, 2020, 2:11 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:08 am It's funnier that way.
Fine then. I think we should have two different words for lose. One for "lost my keys" and the other for "lose a war". All English, Turkish, and French have a single word for both meanings, and I don't really know why.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 3rd, 2020, 2:17 am
by Hunting
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:11 am
fluffykitty wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:08 am It's funnier that way.
Fine then. I think we should have two different words for lose. One for "lost my keys" and the other for "lose a war". All English, Turkish, and French have a single word for both meanings, and I don't really know why.
<hyx> -lose (as in a chess game).

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 3rd, 2020, 2:25 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:17 am <hyx> -lose (as in a chess game).
I'm having trouble pronouncing this mainly because I cannot properly pronounce <h> (/ç/). Can you pronounce it? I'm trying to pronounce it by saying /j/ and then pronouncing something like /ʃ/.
Edit: Infinitive is -(m)ai so "to lose" is <hyxai>.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 3rd, 2020, 2:26 am
by fluffykitty
I learned it by doing /hj/.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 3rd, 2020, 2:29 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:26 am I learned it by doing /hj/.
That kind of sounds different from /ç/. There's still an audible /j/ at the end too.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 3rd, 2020, 2:39 am
by Hunting
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:25 am
Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:17 am <hyx> -lose (as in a chess game).
I'm having trouble pronouncing this mainly because I cannot properly pronounce <h> (/ç/). Can you pronounce it? I'm trying to pronounce it by saying /j/ and then pronouncing something like /ʃ/.
Edit: Infinitive is -(m)ai so "to lose" is <hyxai>.
I can't reliably pronounce it - maybe a Goodlanguage native speaker can :))

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 3rd, 2020, 2:42 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:39 am I can't reliably pronounce it - maybe a Goodlanguage native speaker can :))
Is that what we're calling it now? Also, do you have any ideas for vocabulary or really anything else?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 3rd, 2020, 2:43 am
by fluffykitty
Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:39 am
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:25 am
Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:17 am <hyx> -lose (as in a chess game).
I'm having trouble pronouncing this mainly because I cannot properly pronounce <h> (/ç/). Can you pronounce it? I'm trying to pronounce it by saying /j/ and then pronouncing something like /ʃ/.
Edit: Infinitive is -(m)ai so "to lose" is <hyxai>.
I can't reliably pronounce it - maybe a Goodlanguage native speaker can :))
Another way to do it is to start with /j/, close it until you hear fricative turbulence, then turn off voicing.
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:42 am
Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:39 am I can't reliably pronounce it - maybe a Goodlanguage native speaker can :))
Is that what we're calling it now? Also, do you have any ideas for vocabulary or really anything else?
I've been calling it that for a while (or at least "the good language").