Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 3:07 am
Going to read the transcripts later.
Forums for Conway's Game of Life
https://conwaylife.com/forums/
Should we have other particles?
What kind of meanings would they have? The Wikipedia page on particles has a whole part on Turkish particles. It says they have no meaning on their own, but to me it doesn't seem like that. Maybe we could use some meanings from those?
I noticed that a lot of those sentences use adverbs. We should try and make them. We already have converb adverbs, but we also need a way to make them from adjectives.fluffykitty wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 3:34 am If you can think of anything, then go ahead. Also, there's a list of example sentences here which tests a lot of grammatical features. We should try to translate those.
Yes, though do we even have any adjectives yet?
Ok.
Ok then edible is also <rank>.
Why do they share a word?
fluffykitty wrote: November 15th, 2020, 6:15 am If we're moving on to syntax and stuff, here's some things I think we should do:
- Make the word for "good" the same as the word for "edible" (and maybe have more food metaphors while we're at it)
- SOV word order
- Split case marking across determiner and noun (like in German)
- Use auxiliary verbs
- Allow omission of subject pronouns by marking person and number on verbs
- Sandhi with grammatical affixes
- Affixes for deriving agent nouns and similar from verbs (eg English "-er", "-ee", but for more arguments like "receiver", "tool", "source", etc)
Why js it so though?Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 4:57 amfluffykitty wrote: November 15th, 2020, 6:15 am If we're moving on to syntax and stuff, here's some things I think we should do:
- Make the word for "good" the same as the word for "edible" (and maybe have more food metaphors while we're at it)
- SOV word order
- Split case marking across determiner and noun (like in German)
- Use auxiliary verbs
- Allow omission of subject pronouns by marking person and number on verbs
- Sandhi with grammatical affixes
- Affixes for deriving agent nouns and similar from verbs (eg English "-er", "-ee", but for more arguments like "receiver", "tool", "source", etc)
I have absolutely no idea.
It's funnier that way.
Fine then. I think we should have two different words for lose. One for "lost my keys" and the other for "lose a war". All English, Turkish, and French have a single word for both meanings, and I don't really know why.
<hyx> -lose (as in a chess game).Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:11 amFine then. I think we should have two different words for lose. One for "lost my keys" and the other for "lose a war". All English, Turkish, and French have a single word for both meanings, and I don't really know why.
I'm having trouble pronouncing this mainly because I cannot properly pronounce <h> (/ç/). Can you pronounce it? I'm trying to pronounce it by saying /j/ and then pronouncing something like /ʃ/.
That kind of sounds different from /ç/. There's still an audible /j/ at the end too.
I can't reliably pronounce it - maybe a Goodlanguage native speaker can :))Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:25 amI'm having trouble pronouncing this mainly because I cannot properly pronounce <h> (/ç/). Can you pronounce it? I'm trying to pronounce it by saying /j/ and then pronouncing something like /ʃ/.
Edit: Infinitive is -(m)ai so "to lose" is <hyxai>.
Is that what we're calling it now? Also, do you have any ideas for vocabulary or really anything else?Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:39 am I can't reliably pronounce it - maybe a Goodlanguage native speaker can)
Another way to do it is to start with /j/, close it until you hear fricative turbulence, then turn off voicing.Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:39 amI can't reliably pronounce it - maybe a Goodlanguage native speaker canSchiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:25 amI'm having trouble pronouncing this mainly because I cannot properly pronounce <h> (/ç/). Can you pronounce it? I'm trying to pronounce it by saying /j/ and then pronouncing something like /ʃ/.
Edit: Infinitive is -(m)ai so "to lose" is <hyxai>.)
I've been calling it that for a while (or at least "the good language").Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:42 amIs that what we're calling it now? Also, do you have any ideas for vocabulary or really anything else?Hunting wrote: December 3rd, 2020, 2:39 am I can't reliably pronounce it - maybe a Goodlanguage native speaker can)