?yujh wrote: July 27th, 2022, 12:10 amhey i think you forgot about somethingbreaker's glider gun wrote: July 26th, 2022, 11:50 pmSadly 4 transitions. :(Code: Select all
x = 5, y = 5, rule = B34e5c/S2-n3-c 2o$obo$bobo$2bobo$3b2o!
That still only counts as one rule 4TFL - not as two rules 2TFL (which would be more likely to be on-topic in the R2TFL thread), neither as four rules 1TFL. (My suggestion is to post rules that are neither 1TFL nor 2TFL in TFYUCA/MDIOCA.)breaker's glider gun wrote: July 27th, 2022, 8:33 am?yujh wrote: July 27th, 2022, 12:10 amhey i think you forgot about somethingbreaker's glider gun wrote: July 26th, 2022, 11:50 pmSadly 4 transitions. :(Code: Select all
x = 5, y = 5, rule = B34e5c/S2-n3-c 2o$obo$bobo$2bobo$3b2o!
+B4e
+B5c
-S2n
-S3c
?
what's wrong?
Some CA enthusiasts lived longer...otismo wrote: July 28th, 2022, 12:13 am this next one is easy :
Your Life = 100 Years
( if you're lucky... )
they were very luckyconfocaloid wrote: July 28th, 2022, 12:28 amSome CA enthusiasts lived longer...otismo wrote: July 28th, 2022, 12:13 am this next one is easy :
Your Life = 100 Years
( if you're lucky... )
confocaloid wrote: July 27th, 2022, 11:58 amThat still only counts as one rule 4TFL - not as two rules 2TFL (which would be more likely to be on-topic in the R2TFL thread), neither as four rules 1TFL. (My suggestion is to post rules that are neither 1TFL nor 2TFL in TFYUCA/MDIOCA.)
This post belongs to the Still Life Synthesis Thread. Please move it.breaker's glider gun wrote: July 28th, 2022, 12:35 pmconfocaloid wrote: July 27th, 2022, 11:58 amThat still only counts as one rule 4TFL - not as two rules 2TFL (which would be more likely to be on-topic in the R2TFL thread), neither as four rules 1TFL. (My suggestion is to post rules that are neither 1TFL nor 2TFL in TFYUCA/MDIOCA.)
what on EARTH?yujh wrote: July 29th, 2022, 9:33 amThis post belongs to the Still Life Synthesis Thread. Please move it.breaker's glider gun wrote: July 28th, 2022, 12:35 pmconfocaloid wrote: July 27th, 2022, 11:58 am
That still only counts as one rule 4TFL - not as two rules 2TFL (which would be more likely to be on-topic in the R2TFL thread), neither as four rules 1TFL. (My suggestion is to post rules that are neither 1TFL nor 2TFL in TFYUCA/MDIOCA.)
what on EARTH?breaker's glider gun wrote: July 29th, 2022, 11:08 amwhat on EARTH?yujh wrote: July 29th, 2022, 9:33 amThis post belongs to the Still Life Synthesis Thread. Please move it.
it's not a still life even!
it's a pretty engineered oscillator!
and SYNTHESIS?
there is no synthesis known yet!
For me, being tempted to read the Bookotismo wrote: July 28th, 2022, 10:06 am Now, An Admission :
I must own up to the awful truth;
I have had our textbook for over a year and have not read it.
I am still "experiencing" Conway's Game of Life.
I am afraid if I read the Book, it would become trivial.
The Fun lies in exploring and discovering for yourself.
But then I spend a day or two following all the mind-blowing recent progress in our forums.
I feel it would no longer be mind-blowing if I read the Book.
( I might even start making significant noteworthy contributions - have them named after me even... )
Imagine if I studied Humanity enough that Humans became trivial. Horrors.
No-one makes any Loafer BitMap Printers because they are trivial ( except Jormungant, MrT and me ).
Somehow I feel I would lose a lot of my Life Enthusiasm;
maybe I am wrong ?
yujh wrote: July 29th, 2022, 11:12 amwhat on EARTH?breaker's glider gun wrote: July 29th, 2022, 11:08 amwhat on EARTH?yujh wrote: July 29th, 2022, 9:33 am
This post belongs to the Still Life Synthesis Thread. Please move it.
it's not a still life even!
it's a pretty engineered oscillator!
and SYNTHESIS?
there is no synthesis known yet!
it's not a rule two transitions from life even!
it's a random obviously known oscillator!
and TWO TRANSITIONS FROM LIFE?
there is no 2=4 known yet!
actually, there is.
therefore oscillator=still life synthesis. Why do you still don't realize that you posted something off-topic???breaker's glider gun wrote: July 29th, 2022, 12:29 pmyujh wrote: July 29th, 2022, 11:12 amwhat on EARTH?breaker's glider gun wrote: July 29th, 2022, 11:08 am
what on EARTH?
it's not a still life even!
it's a pretty engineered oscillator!
and SYNTHESIS?
there is no synthesis known yet!
it's not a rule two transitions from life even!
it's a random obviously known oscillator!
and TWO TRANSITIONS FROM LIFE?
there is no 2=4 known yet!actually, there is.
1=sqrt(1)=sqrt(-1*-1)=i*i=-1
-1=1.
add 1 to both sides, and you get
0=2
add 2 to both sides, and you get
2=4
taa-daaa!
"oscillator" and "still life"...yujh wrote: July 29th, 2022, 1:37 pmtherefore oscillator=still life synthesis. Why do you still don't realize that you posted something off-topic???breaker's glider gun wrote: July 29th, 2022, 12:29 pmyujh wrote: July 29th, 2022, 11:12 am
what on EARTH?
it's not a rule two transitions from life even!
it's a random obviously known oscillator!
and TWO TRANSITIONS FROM LIFE?
there is no 2=4 known yet!actually, there is.
1=sqrt(1)=sqrt(-1*-1)=i*i=-1
-1=1.
add 1 to both sides, and you get
0=2
add 2 to both sides, and you get
2=4
taa-daaa!
From Life Wiki :otismo wrote: July 28th, 2022, 12:13 am Practical CGoL ( or what is your Mission Statement )
Naturally, this involves Math...
1 Hour = 60 Minutes X 60 Seconds / Minute
= 3600 Seconds
1 Day = 24 Hours X 3600 Seconds / Hour
= 86,400 Seconds
1 Year = 365 Days X 86,400 seconds / Day
= 31,536,000 Seconds
this next one is easy :
Your Life = 100 Years
( if you're lucky... )
1 Life = 100 Years X 31,536,000 Seconds / Year
= 3,153,600,000 Seconds
= approximately 3 Billion Seconds
Let us say that One Billion " Life Objects "
are discovered say, by the end of next year...
If you spent your entire life looking at CGoL
" Objects " for, say, ten seconds each -
that would require ten billion seconds
or three lifetimes - so what are you
trying to do with CGoL,
exactly...
wwei47 wrote: March 24th, 2021, 8:21 am.
EDIT: When I want to indent a list, let me indent the list.
EDIT by dvgrn: The annoying indentation problem isn't really the forum software's fault (for a change). Browsers universally remove leading spaces from displayed text, along with sticking multiple lines of text together. It's very very old behavior, so changing it would break almost every web page in existence; the idea is to be able to re-flow document text cleanly when it appears on screens of different widths, while still supporting readable formatted source HTML. The regular view of a rule table on the LifeWiki gets all messed up for somewhat the same reason.
To avoid the problem, just paste in some kind of Unicode space character instead of a regular space. I've edited in em spaces above as an example.
Wikipedia wrote:A monk asked, "Does a dog have a Buddha-nature or not?"
The master said,
Wikipedia wrote:"Because he has the nature of karmic delusions".
Oh no 551st p8#)@7@7#7yujh wrote: July 27th, 2022, 12:10 am
HotWheels9232 wrote: September 8th, 2022, 2:44 pmOh no 551st p8#)@7@7#7
Silliyujh wrote: September 8th, 2022, 5:41 pm
AbhpzTa wrote: May 22nd, 2017, 9:44 amOnly copying/cutting/pasting... etc.Rhombic wrote:EDIT:
AbhpzTa, I've always wondered, what script do you use to find some of your syntheses and strung-together-puffer spaceships? I've seen some remarkably surprising syntheses stemming from weird still life seeds that I can only imagine as coming from the output of some script!!
Anyway, I've never used any script for searching yet.
Please note that all contributions to LifeWiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2 (see LifeWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
# Copyright by Yoel Matveyev, 2022
# The GNU General Public License v3.0
