Page 14 of 18

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 29th, 2020, 4:15 pm
by fluffykitty
Something like that.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 29th, 2020, 5:31 pm
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 29th, 2020, 4:15 pm Something like that.
So this language will have that?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 29th, 2020, 6:38 pm
by fluffykitty
Well, if all verbs are by default transitive, then something like that will probably be necessary.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 2:39 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 29th, 2020, 6:38 pm Well, if all verbs are by default transitive, then something like that will probably be necessary.
Ok so under this system we will need a transitive -> intransitive suffix and subject -> object suffix?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 2:49 am
by fluffykitty
We'd have the passive voice suffix, the middle voice suffix, the causative suffix, and probably also the other promotion suffixes.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 2:51 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 30th, 2020, 2:49 am We'd have the passive voice suffix, the middle voice suffix, the causative suffix, and probably also the other promotion suffixes.
Would causative be like <I moved the chair.>?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 2:55 am
by fluffykitty
If our version of "move" was primitively intransitive, then that would use the causative suffix.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 2:58 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 30th, 2020, 2:55 am If our version of "move" was primitively intransitive, then that would use the causative suffix.
Is the default transitive or intransitive then? Your post seems to say it's intransitive. That's what I'd said at first but I thought there was a problem and changed it. What do you mean by "primitively"?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 3:08 am
by fluffykitty
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: November 30th, 2020, 2:58 am
fluffykitty wrote: November 30th, 2020, 2:55 am If our version of "move" was primitively intransitive, then that would use the causative suffix.
Is the default transitive or intransitive then? Your post seems to say it's intransitive. That's what I'd said at first but I thought there was a problem and changed it.
I dunno. For verbs like this I think we should default to intransitive.
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: November 30th, 2020, 2:58 am What do you mean by "primitively"?
Without modification from voice affixes.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 3:15 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 30th, 2020, 3:08 am I dunno. For verbs like this I think we should default to intransitive.
Ok then, do we need any object -> subject suffix or subject -> object suffix?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 3:17 am
by fluffykitty
The object to subject suffixes are the passive suffix and the middle voice suffix, and the subject to object suffix is the causative suffix.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 3:30 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 30th, 2020, 3:17 am The object to subject suffixes are the passive suffix and the middle voice suffix, and the subject to object suffix is the causative suffix.
Are the passive and middle voice suffixes the same?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 3:38 am
by fluffykitty
Probably not. We should actually construct these suffixes at some point.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 3:40 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 30th, 2020, 3:38 am Probably not. We should actually construct these suffixes at some point.
How about right now? Also, these suffixes come after case markers, right?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 3:47 am
by fluffykitty
The voicing and promotion suffixes apply to verbs. So far, the only inflection we have for nouns is the case+number marker. I think the order of suffixes should be verb-promotion/causative-voice-tense.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 4:17 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 30th, 2020, 3:47 am The voicing and promotion suffixes apply to verbs. So far, the only inflection we have for nouns is the case+number marker. I think the order of suffixes should be verb-promotion/causative-voice-tense.
Ok, that's fine by me. Let's start making the suffixes.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 4:43 am
by fluffykitty
The passive suffix <-(s)o-> was posted here. The middle voice suffix could be <-(x)e->.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 1st, 2020, 3:00 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
What should we do now? I think we can at least translate some simple sentences.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 1st, 2020, 3:10 am
by fluffykitty
<Ni ngwelu ynca kalane saithanein> "The food is on the table", <Ngwengeihco> "You are eating". and we should probably figure out how we'll do stuff like "can" and "should". Here's a video about stuff like that, and here's a Pastebin of the transcript for Hunting. Also, I don't really like the <-eihc-> suffix for the present continuous. I think we should change it to <-eic->.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 2:12 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: December 1st, 2020, 3:10 am <Ni ngwelu ynca kalane saithanein> "The food is on the table", <Ngwengeihco> "You are eating". and we should probably figure out how we'll do stuff like "can" and "should". Here's a video about stuff like that, and here's a Pastebin of the transcript for Hunting. Also, I don't really like the <-eihc-> suffix for the present continuous. I think we should change it to <-eic->.
We should also figure out how to ask questions. Should we add a word like in English <Do(es) + SVO) or change word order or do something else entirely? I will watch the video today. I'm okay with changing <-eihc-> to <-eic->.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 2:17 am
by fluffykitty
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 2:12 am
fluffykitty wrote: November 29th, 1973, 5:33 pm <Ni ngwelu ynca kalane saithanein> "The food is on the table", <Ngwengeihco> "You are eating". and we should probably figure out how we'll do stuff like "can" and "should". Here's a video about stuff like that, and here's a Pastebin of the transcript for Hunting. Also, I don't really like the <-eihc-> suffix for the present continuous. I think we should change it to <-eic->.
We should also figure out how to ask questions. Should we add a word like in English <Do(es) + SVO) or change word order or do something else entirely?
Maybe we could use a particle after the verb.
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 2:12 am I will watch the video today. I'm okay with changing <-eihc-> to <-eic->.
Okay.

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 2:28 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 2:17 am Maybe we could use a particle after the verb.
Okay. Should it be a new words or some reused word like the <to> in <to go>?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 2:46 am
by fluffykitty
How about <tsum>?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 2:49 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 2:46 am How about <tsum>?
Ok. Are there any problems that could happen when we make questions that we haven't yet thought about?

Re: Let's create a good language!

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 3:03 am
by fluffykitty
I don't think so.