Page 11 of 18
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 4:59 am
by fluffykitty
I'm saying that in the current language, "to sleep" and "to at-sleep" only differ by a promotion affix and have the same meaning except that "to at-sleep" uses its direct object as a location.
This video and the next have some information about how to evolve a language. I'd like to make this language more complete before evolving it though.
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 5:13 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 4:59 am
I'm saying that in the current language, "to sleep" and "to at-sleep" only differ by a promotion affix and have the same meaning except that "to at-sleep" uses its direct object as a location.
This video and the next have some information about how to evolve a language. I'd like to make this language more complete before evolving it though.
Well of course we shouldn't evolve it yet. How should we make relative clauses?
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 5:25 am
by fluffykitty
Latin uses an inflecting relative pronoun (like English "to/of/etc which", but with cases). Maybe we could do that?
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 5:34 am
by Hunting
what is case mark?
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 5:36 am
by fluffykitty
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 5:37 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 5:25 am
Latin uses an inflecting relative pronoun (like English "to/of/etc which", but with cases). Maybe we could do that?
How does that work? Also, should there be a difference between <that>, <who>, <where>, and <when> in relative clauses? If yes, should we reuse the question words like in English and French or find another way?
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 5:46 am
by fluffykitty
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: November 25th, 2020, 5:37 am
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 5:25 am
Latin uses an inflecting relative pronoun (like English "to/of/etc which", but with cases). Maybe we could do that?
How does that work? Also, should there be a difference between <that>, <who>, <where>, and <when> in relative clauses? If yes, should we reuse the question words like in English and French or find another way?
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/qui#Pronoun_8, so "homō cui dedī" <the person I gave to> (probably). I think "where" and "when" should use the locative case of "that", with "who" staying separate, and that we should use different words for questions and relative pronouns.
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 5:56 am
by Hunting
How to say or subsitute "is"?
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 6:01 am
by fluffykitty
<saitai> "to be", example inflected form <saihanein> "is (inanimate)"
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 6:07 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 5:46 am
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/qui#Pronoun_8, so "homō cui dedī" <the person I gave to> (probably). I think "where" and "when" should use the locative case of "that", with "who" staying separate, and that we should use different words for questions and relative pronouns.
Will <that> be a word or a suffix? I prefer word. I don't think the question who and relative clause who should be the same word.
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 6:01 am
<saitai> "to be", example inflected form <saihanein> "is (inanimate)"
Can you break <saihanein> apart? I don't know of any word that means inanimate. What happened to the t a the end of <saitai>?
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 6:08 am
by Hunting
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 6:01 am
<saitai> "to be", example inflected form <saihanein> "is (inanimate)"
So we have animate and inanimate form of every word?
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 6:16 am
by fluffykitty
Not every word, but probably quite a few (third person verbs, question words, and relative pronouns so far)
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 6:20 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 6:16 am
Not every word, but probably quite a few (third person verbs, question words, and relative pronouns so far)
We don't have it for nouns, right? Also, please answer my question.
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 6:26 am
by fluffykitty
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: November 25th, 2020, 6:07 am
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 5:46 am
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/qui#Pronoun_8, so "homō cui dedī" <the person I gave to> (probably). I think "where" and "when" should use the locative case of "that", with "who" staying separate, and that we should use different words for questions and relative pronouns.
Will <that> be a word or a suffix? I prefer word.
Probably a word.
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: November 25th, 2020, 6:07 am
I don't think the question who and relative clause who should be the same word.
Yep.
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: November 25th, 2020, 6:07 am
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 6:01 am
<saitai> "to be", example inflected form <saihanein> "is (inanimate)"
Can you break <saihanein> apart? I don't know of any word that means inanimate. What happened to the t a the end of <saitai>?
Yes, there should be a /t/ there. <sait-han-ein> "be-PRES-3INAN"
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: November 25th, 2020, 6:20 am
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 6:16 am
Not every word, but probably quite a few (third person verbs, question words, and relative pronouns so far)
We don't have it for nouns, right?
Nouns are not inflected for animate/inanimate.
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 6:45 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
Could you please repost some suffixes? I'm going to add them to my user page.
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 6:50 am
by fluffykitty
Code: Select all
Person suffixes
First person -et
Second person -o
Third person animate -ei
Third person inanimate -ein
Infinitive (m)ay
Simple present han
Continuous present (X/l)eihc
Simple future (S/l)uh
Continuous future (H/h)em
Fricative/stop Singular Plural Nasal/approx Singular Plural Monophthong Singular Plural
Nominative -e -oi Nominative -e Nominative -(l)u
Accusative Accusative -Sa -e Accusative -s -n
Genitive -Ha -Si Genitive -Ho -oi Genitive -ne -noi
Dative -Fu -Foi Dative -Xu -Xoi Dative -l -(m)it
Instrumental -Ho -Si Instrumental -Ho -oi Instrumental -ni -ne
Locative -Ha -Foi Locative -Ho -Xoi Locative -ne -(m)it
and passive <-(s)o->
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 25th, 2020, 3:31 pm
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 25th, 2020, 6:50 am
Code: Select all
Person suffixes
First person -et
Second person -o
Third person animate -ei
Third person inanimate -ein
Infinitive (m)ay
Simple present han
Continuous present (X/l)eihc
Simple future (S/l)uh
Continuous future (H/h)em
Fricative/stop Singular Plural Nasal/approx Singular Plural Monophthong Singular Plural
Nominative -e -oi Nominative -e Nominative -(l)u
Accusative Accusative -Sa -e Accusative -s -n
Genitive -Ha -Si Genitive -Ho -oi Genitive -ne -noi
Dative -Fu -Foi Dative -Xu -Xoi Dative -l -(m)it
Instrumental -Ho -Si Instrumental -Ho -oi Instrumental -ni -ne
Locative -Ha -Foi Locative -Ho -Xoi Locative -ne -(m)it
and passive <-(s)o->
I can't put these in a table unfortunately because the syntax to make tables and suffixes both use dashes.
Edit: There is a part on how to put negative numbers, so the problem should probably be solved.
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 26th, 2020, 3:55 am
by fluffykitty
Okay. We should make more words, like <nwail> "cat" and <pli> "person". Also, do adjectives precede or follow nouns?
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 26th, 2020, 4:07 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 26th, 2020, 3:55 am
Okay. We should make more words, like <nwail> "cat" and <pli> "person". Also, do adjectives precede or follow nouns?
We could have it change meaning like in French <homme pauvre> <poor man (monetarily)> while <pauvre homme> <poor man (normal meaning)>. Usually when it comes after it has a more literal meaning.
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 26th, 2020, 4:22 am
by fluffykitty
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: November 26th, 2020, 4:07 am
fluffykitty wrote: November 26th, 2020, 3:55 am
Okay. We should make more words, like <nwail> "cat" and <pli> "person". Also, do adjectives precede or follow nouns?
We could have it change meaning like in French <homme pauvre> <poor man (monetarily)> while <pauvre homme> <poor man (normal meaning)>. Usually when it comes after it has a more literal meaning.
I suppose we could do that. (Also, that was your 1111th post.)
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 26th, 2020, 4:26 am
by Hunting
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: November 26th, 2020, 4:07 am
fluffykitty wrote: November 26th, 2020, 3:55 am
Okay. We should make more words, like <nwail> "cat" and <pli> "person". Also, do adjectives precede or follow nouns?
We could have it change meaning like in French <homme pauvre> <poor man (monetarily)> while <pauvre homme> <poor man (normal meaning)>. Usually when it comes after it has a more literal meaning.
Your 1111st post.
We could also have it in the middle.
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 26th, 2020, 4:32 am
by fluffykitty
In the middle of what?
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 26th, 2020, 4:39 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
Hunting wrote: November 26th, 2020, 4:26 am
We could also have it in the middle.
fluffykitty wrote: November 26th, 2020, 4:32 am
In the middle of what?
I was wondering that too.
fluffykitty wrote: November 26th, 2020, 4:22 am
(Also, that was your 1111th post.)
Hunting wrote: November 26th, 2020, 4:26 am
Your 1111st post.
Nice.
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 26th, 2020, 4:48 am
by fluffykitty
Do you have any proposals for expanding the lexicon? Some obvious choices are animals and body parts (from which we can derive sense verbs using the instrumental+verb endings).
Re: Let's create a good language!
Posted: November 26th, 2020, 4:52 am
by Schiaparelliorbust
fluffykitty wrote: November 26th, 2020, 4:48 am
Do you have any proposals for expanding the lexicon? Some obvious choices are animals and body parts (from which we can derive sense verbs using the instrumental+verb endings).
I was thinking body parts too. Not all body parts have an obvious/primary function like fingers, arms, mouth etc, so we shouldn't have every single body part be a "tool" for a verb. Calling a mouth "eater" would shadow that it is also used for speaking or other body parts also help with eating, so it might be kind of ambiguous.