ConwayLife.com

get_Snacked wrote: August 6th, 2024, 2:31 pm

ababa11e wrote: August 5th, 2024, 12:40 am what about, Ababa's T function. T[n] = the smallest prime number you cannot make by adding 2 smaller primes, below 2n.
T[2]= 11, T[3] = ...something,
T[T[2]] is probably higher than 10 billion,
T_3[2] = probably higher than 10^^3
T_10[2] is probably higher than 10^^^2
now one above that is T_T[2][2], which i'm gonna call T_w[2], cuz its T[2] as the iteration amount
T_w+n[2] = T_T_n-1[2][2]
T_w2[2] = T_T_T_n-1[2][2][2]
now if you do this T[n] times you get T_w^2[2]
you you can keep doing this infinitely...until you get T_e0[2]
you can swap e0 for any ordinal, and my number is T_φ(10,0)[2], where φ(10,0) is Veblen's function, a way of making large ordinals.

correct me if i'm wrong, but since that involves prime numbers, it should be uncomputable.

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 8:27 am My starting number is 0.0006

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 8:27 am It's been a week since Ababa11e posted and the thread descended into chaos (not really his fault but it is what chronologically happened after he posted). I hereby declare the following:
1) Bump
2) I can declare things
3) NEW ROUND
4) My starting number is 0.0006

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:24 am

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 8:27 am It's been a week since Ababa11e posted and the thread descended into chaos (not really his fault but it is what chronologically happened after he posted). I hereby declare the following:
1) Bump
2) I can declare things
3) NEW ROUND
4) My starting number is 0.0006

HEY. >:( undo that
redo with og rules: my number is 3^^3

Rules [just as a reminder]:
A: NO SALAD NUMBERS! [eg no rayo's number, no TREE[TREE[TREE[G[64]], no using overused functions more than once, and NO tree(x)]
B: As original as possible please. Ones that i consider good will be favourited by me.
C: It must be well defined, computable, and finite.
D: You must quote the previous post, over, and over, with no end.

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:32 am

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:24 am

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 8:27 am It's been a week since Ababa11e posted and the thread descended into chaos (not really his fault but it is what chronologically happened after he posted). I hereby declare the following:
1) Bump
2) I can declare things
3) NEW ROUND
4) My starting number is 0.0006

HEY. >:( undo that
redo with og rules: my number is 3^^3

Rules [just as a reminder]:
A: NO SALAD NUMBERS! [eg no rayo's number, no TREE[TREE[TREE[G[64]], no using overused functions more than once, and NO tree(x)]
B: As original as possible please. Ones that i consider good will be favourited by me.
C: It must be well defined, computable, and finite.
D: You must quote the previous post, over, and over, with no end.

Alright. In either case, my number is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 (2^63 - 1)

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:34 am

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:32 am

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:24 am
HEY. >:( undo that
redo with og rules: my number is 3^^3

Rules [just as a reminder]:
A: NO SALAD NUMBERS! [eg no rayo's number, no TREE[TREE[TREE[G[64]], no using overused functions more than once, and NO tree(x)]
B: As original as possible please. Ones that i consider good will be favourited by me.
C: It must be well defined, computable, and finite.
D: You must quote the previous post, over, and over, with no end.

Alright. In either case, my number is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 (2^63 - 1)

Okay, so my 2nd one is (2^^3)^3 [1.157*10^77]

7-year-old me wrote: First, imagine a trillion 9's in a row. Then make THAT the number of nines that are in a row. Now use THAT number as the number of nines...
Do this a trillion times and then just add 2 for no reason.

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:42 am

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:34 am

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:32 am

Alright. In either case, my number is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 (2^63 - 1)

Okay, so my 2nd one is (2^^3)^3 [1.157*10^77]

In that case, I'll use the biggest number I could think of when I was 7.

7-year-old me wrote: First, imagine a trillion 9's in a row. Then make THAT the number of nines that are in a row. Now use THAT number as the number of nines...
Do this a trillion times and then just add 2 for no reason.

I never gave that number a name, but that's my number.

Edit: That's my 444th post!!
Edit 2: For anyone who wants to know the context of this number, I was talking about big numbers with my dad (he'd just explained googol and googolplex to me). Then I told him my number and that that was how much I loved him

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:51 am

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:42 am

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:34 am
Okay, so my 2nd one is (2^^3)^3 [1.157*10^77]

In that case, I'll use the biggest number I could think of when I was 7.

7-year-old me wrote: First, imagine a trillion 9's in a row. Then make THAT the number of nines that are in a row. Now use THAT number as the number of nines...
Do this a trillion times and then just add 2 for no reason.

I never gave that number a name, but that's my number.

Edit: That's my 444th post!!
Edit 2: For anyone who wants to know the context of this number, I was talking about big numbers with my dad (he'd just explained googol and googolplex to me). Then I told him my number and that that was how much I loved him

That's wholesome, but that's only about 10^^(10^12), so I'm gonna do this. 14!!!!!!!!!!! is roughly 10^^(9*10^12), which is bigger

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:55 am

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:51 am

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:42 am
In that case, I'll use the biggest number I could think of when I was 7.

I never gave that number a name, but that's my number.

Edit: That's my 444th post!!
Edit 2: For anyone who wants to know the context of this number, I was talking about big numbers with my dad (he'd just explained googol and googolplex to me). Then I told him my number and that that was how much I loved him :)

That's wholesome, but that's only about 10^^(10^12), so I'm gonna do this. 14!!!!!!!!!!! is roughly 10^^(9*10^12), which is bigger

I'll stay simple for a bit. 10^^^3.

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:55 am

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:51 am

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:42 am
In that case, I'll use the biggest number I could think of when I was 7.

I never gave that number a name, but that's my number.

Edit: That's my 444th post!!
Edit 2: For anyone who wants to know the context of this number, I was talking about big numbers with my dad (he'd just explained googol and googolplex to me). Then I told him my number and that that was how much I loved him

That's wholesome, but that's only about 10^^(10^12), so I'm gonna do this. 14!!!!!!!!!!! is roughly 10^^(9*10^12), which is bigger

I'll stay simple for a bit. 10^^^3.

unname4798 wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:57 am

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:55 am

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:51 am
That's wholesome, but that's only about 10^^(10^12), so I'm gonna do this. 14!!!!!!!!!!! is roughly 10^^(9*10^12), which is bigger

I'll stay simple for a bit. 10^^^3.

10^^^^^^^^^^10

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 11:05 am

unname4798 wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:57 am

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:55 am

I'll stay simple for a bit. 10^^^3.

10^^^^^^^^^^10

10{10^100}10, in BEAF. This means there are 10^100 up arrows.

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 11:10 am

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 11:05 am

unname4798 wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:57 am
10^^^^^^^^^^10

10{10^100}10, in BEAF. This means there are 10^100 up arrows.

can everyone slow down the pace a bit? anyways G[2], the G[] part being the function that leads to graham's number.

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:24 am D: You must quote the previous post, over, and over, with no end.

confocaloid wrote: August 12th, 2024, 11:15 am

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 10:24 am D: You must quote the previous post, over, and over, with no end.

You do realize that this violates forum rule 3d (no unnecessary nested quotes), and the entire thread likely violates forum rule 4 (chatty, high-volume, not CA-related)?

a bunch of quotes

rutabaga wrote: August 12th, 2024, 12:12 pm

a bunch of quotes

It's been an hour lol

G[5]

ababa11e wrote: August 12th, 2024, 9:15 pmG(G(3))

JoshM wrote: August 12th, 2024, 11:25 pm g_3024(g_32(1024)). g_3024 iterations, starting with g_32(1024).