A forum for topics that don't fit elsewhere. Introduce yourselves to other members of the forums, discuss how your name evolves when written out in the Game of Life, or just tell us how you found it. Forum rules still apply.
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 28th, 2020, 10:14 am
Ok, can we get started on designing the combustion CA?
Yes!
Can you visit my project Country CA?
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Yes, I saw that too. I will post there. I think the combustion CA should have heat.
Heat and energy are definitely needed if you ask me,altrough they shouldn't be like athoms.Heat and energy are needed in some reactions and they are often released or used too and they are needed because of that. I think the second edition is going to need nitrogen.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
777
I CAN APGSEARCH NOW!
Sure, I was a bad person, but I have changed myself.
I'd love to befriend anybody who's interested.
Have a good day!
BokaBB wrote: October 28th, 2020, 11:53 am
Heat and energy are definitely needed if you ask me,altrough they shouldn't be like athoms.Heat and energy are needed in some reactions and they are often released or used too and they are needed because of that. I think the second edition is going to need nitrogen.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
I think heat should move through atoms by contact and through space by radiation. A certain temperature will be needed to start a certain reaction.
BokaBB wrote: October 28th, 2020, 11:53 am
Heat and energy are definitely needed if you ask me,altrough they shouldn't be like athoms.Heat and energy are needed in some reactions and they are often released or used too and they are needed because of that. I think the second edition is going to need nitrogen.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
I think heat should move through atoms by contact and through space by radiation. A certain temperature will be needed to start a certain reaction.
Yes!
Have a good day!
BokaBB
777
I CAN APGSEARCH NOW!
Sure, I was a bad person, but I have changed myself.
I'd love to befriend anybody who's interested.
Have a good day!
BokaBB wrote: October 28th, 2020, 12:06 pm
Yes!
Have a good day!
BokaBB
How should it spread by radiation? Maybe hotter atoms can release higher energy photons?
Maybe something like that or something similar to your proposals in Building A Human Body. I am not sure but I think hotter things move faster.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
777
I CAN APGSEARCH NOW!
Sure, I was a bad person, but I have changed myself.
I'd love to befriend anybody who's interested.
Have a good day!
BokaBB wrote: October 28th, 2020, 12:20 pm
Maybe something like that or something similar to your proposals in Building A Human Body. I am not sure but I think hotter things move faster.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
I don't think they should move faster. That would cause weird problems. Heat should only be a method a starting reactions.
BokaBB wrote: October 28th, 2020, 12:20 pm
Maybe something like that or something similar to your proposals in Building A Human Body. I am not sure but I think hotter things move faster.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
I don't think they should move faster. That would cause weird problems. Heat should only be a method a starting reactions.
I also think so,just informed you.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
777
I CAN APGSEARCH NOW!
Sure, I was a bad person, but I have changed myself.
I'd love to befriend anybody who's interested.
Have a good day!
Moosey wrote: October 28th, 2020, 7:23 pm
A chemical CA involving heat will inevitably have WAYYYYY too many states. Imo keep it as simple as possible at least at first
I don't think that chemicals should react with every other chemical at all times though . If we want some elements to be less reactive than others, we could rephrase that as those elements need to be hot to react. Likewise, we can say that reactive elements don't need a lot of energy to react. I don't know how many states that will use, but I think it's worth a try. Maybe with the combustion CA we can not use it, because there's essentially only one type of reaction, but if we make it more complex we need heat.
Moosey wrote: October 28th, 2020, 7:23 pm
A chemical CA involving heat will inevitably have WAYYYYY too many states. Imo keep it as simple as possible at least at first
I don't think that chemicals should react with every other chemical at all times though . If we want some elements to be less reactive than others, we could rephrase that as those elements need to be hot to react. Likewise, we can say that reactive elements don't need a lot of energy to react. I don't know how many states that will use, but I think it's worth a try. Maybe with the combustion CA we can not use it, because there's essentially only one type of reaction, but if we make it more complex we need heat.
Keep things simple first. For example, first create a CA with two atoms and no bonds and no heat and no reactions. They just moves.
Hunting wrote: October 29th, 2020, 5:10 am
Keep things simple first. For example, first create a CA with two atoms and no bonds and no heat and no reactions. They just moves.
I think it should have bonds but no reactions. We could test how they should collide and bounce off each other.
Hunting wrote: October 29th, 2020, 5:10 am
Keep things simple first. For example, first create a CA with two atoms and no bonds and no heat and no reactions. They just moves.
I think it should have bonds but no reactions. We could test how they should collide and bounce off each other.
Simple first. We need to test how simple particles collide and bounce. Then complex "particles".
Hunting wrote: October 29th, 2020, 5:19 am
Simple first. We need to test how simple particles collide and bounce. Then complex "particles".
Fine, but then bonds. I think there should be different states for atoms travelling in different directions instead of there being a "tail" state. That would just make collisions hard because you have to do something with the tail too. It would also be bad for molecules.
Hunting wrote: October 29th, 2020, 5:19 am
Simple first. We need to test how simple particles collide and bounce. Then complex "particles".
Fine, but then bonds. I think there should be different states for atoms travelling in different directions instead of there being a "tail" state. That would just make collisions hard because you have to do something with the tail too. It would also be bad for molecules.
Yes. Then what? I think we could use a model like Snakes (Rule Table Rule).
