Forums for Conway's Game of Life
https://conwaylife.com/forums/
Okay. I accept to stay small first.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:32 amExplain my idea?This is quite an ambitious project. We should start way smaller. Please look at my chemistry CA proposal.BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 4:44 am We can make it to some degree,but the cellular degree will be too hard and everything would be big.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Explain why your idea make sense and making one single cell represent something larger than a real life cell does not.
Not that "stay small first", but you have to stay small all the time. The behaviour of a cell or even part of a cell is complicated, and not one decided only from neighbourhood.BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:34 amOkay. I accept to stay small first.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:32 amExplain my idea?This is quite an ambitious project. We should start way smaller. Please look at my chemistry CA proposal.BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 4:44 am We can make it to some degree,but the cellular degree will be too hard and everything would be big.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Oki - doki. Just don't be agressive.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:36 amNot that "stay small first", but you have to stay small all the time. The behaviour of a cell or even part of a cell is complicated, and not one decided only from neighbourhood.BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:34 amOkay. I accept to stay small first.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:32 am
Explain my idea?
This is quite an ambitious project. We should start way smaller. Please look at my chemistry CA proposal.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
I'm not so sure about the latter but my idea makes sense because we can make large things without having to make the system too complex. In a human body virtually everything interacts with everything else and we'd need a large neighbourhood but with my chemistry CA we can use the Moore neighbourhood.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:35 am Explain why your idea make sense and making one single cell represent something larger than a real life cell does not.
You always accuse me of being aggressive while yourself being much ruder.BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:37 amOki - doki. Just don't be agressive.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:36 amNot that "stay small first", but you have to stay small all the time. The behaviour of a cell or even part of a cell is complicated, and not one decided only from neighbourhood.BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:34 am
Okay. I accept to stay small first.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Yeah, that's the point.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:40 am In a human body virtually everything interacts with everything else and we'd need a large neighbourhood
At least I show that better and more acceptable way.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:48 amYou always accuse me of being aggressive while yourself being much ruder.BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:37 amOki - doki. Just don't be agressive.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:36 am
Not that "stay small first", but you have to stay small all the time. The behaviour of a cell or even part of a cell is complicated, and not one decided only from neighbourhood.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Ok, can we get started? Let's first decide how many types of atoms there are. I say six should be enough.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:49 amYeah, that's the point.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:40 am In a human body virtually everything interacts with everything else and we'd need a large neighbourhood
That's perfect. And three of them could be the opposite of three others. Do we still use the valence electron system?Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:52 amOk, can we get started? Let's first decide how many types of atoms there are. I say six should be enough.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:49 amYeah, that's the point.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:40 am In a human body virtually everything interacts with everything else and we'd need a large neighbourhood
No, I think that would overcomplicate things. They shouldn't be opposites of each other, they should all have different properties: reactivity, heat capacity, bonding capacity etc.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:54 amThat's perfect. And three of them could be the opposite of three others. Do we still use the valence electron system?Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:52 am Ok, can we get started? Let's first decide how many types of atoms there are. I say six should be enough.
Oh, okay then. Do we still use the valence electron system, question reposted?Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:57 amNo, I think that would overcomplicate things. They shouldn't be opposites of each other, they should all have different properties: reactivity, heat capacity, bonding capacity etc.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:54 amThat's perfect. And three of them could be the opposite of three others. Do we still use the valence electron system?Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:52 am Ok, can we get started? Let's first decide how many types of atoms there are. I say six should be enough.
I said no in my last post.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:01 am Oh, okay then. Do we still use the valence electron system, question reposted?
Advertisement: https://conwaylife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=4811
Advertiser.... Please say me if you accept my agreement proposal,you didn't say even a word.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:01 amOh, okay then. Do we still use the valence electron system, question reposted?Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:57 amNo, I think that would overcomplicate things. They shouldn't be opposites of each other, they should all have different properties: reactivity, heat capacity, bonding capacity etc.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:54 am
That's perfect. And three of them could be the opposite of three others. Do we still use the valence electron system?
Advertisement: https://conwaylife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=4811
I agree with your "interesting idea".BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:04 amAdvertiser.... Please say me if you accept my agreement proposal,you didn't say even a word.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:01 amOh, okay then. Do we still use the valence electron system, question reposted?Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 5:57 am
No, I think that would overcomplicate things. They shouldn't be opposites of each other, they should all have different properties: reactivity, heat capacity, bonding capacity etc.
Advertisement: https://conwaylife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=4811
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Thanks. Please do a bit of search at least every second day. I please you,you don't have to accept,it is up to you.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:04 amI agree with your "interesting idea".BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:04 amAdvertiser.... Please say me if you accept my agreement proposal,you didn't say even a word.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:01 am
Oh, okay then. Do we still use the valence electron system, question reposted?
Advertisement: https://conwaylife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=4811
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Let's say the first element, notation Sch, is of bonding capacity 1, which means it can bond 1 element (?)
First let's make a complete list of the properties.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:04 amI agree with your "interesting idea".BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:04 amAdvertiser.... Please say me if you accept my agreement proposal,you didn't say even a word.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:01 am
Oh, okay then. Do we still use the valence electron system, question reposted?
Advertisement: https://conwaylife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=4811
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Let's say the first element, notation Sch, is of bonding capacity 1, which means it can bond 1 element (?)
Ok. What's the exact definition of "bonding capacity"?Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:13 amFirst let's make a complete list of the properties.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:04 amI agree with your "interesting idea".BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:04 am
Advertiser.... Please say me if you accept my agreement proposal,you didn't say even a word.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Let's say the first element, notation Sch, is of bonding capacity 1, which means it can bond 1 element (?)
Maximum number of atoms an atom can bond to. I think heat conductivity should be a dual-atom property: we define it for atom pairs and not single atoms. So should reactivity.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:29 am Ok. What's the exact definition of "bonding capacity"?
Heat conductivity
Oh, okay.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:32 amMaximum number of atoms an atom can bond to. I think heat conductivity should be a dual-atom property: we define it for atom pairs and not single atoms. So should reactivity.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:29 am Ok. What's the exact definition of "bonding capacity"?
Heat conductivity
Any more properties?Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:40 amOh, okay.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:32 am Maximum number of atoms an atom can bond to. I think heat conductivity should be a dual-atom property: we define it for atom pairs and not single atoms. So should reactivity.
How big is the price of one haul?Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:04 amI agree with your "interesting idea".BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:04 amAdvertiser.... Please say me if you accept my agreement proposal,you didn't say even a word.Hunting wrote: October 27th, 2020, 6:01 am
Oh, okay then. Do we still use the valence electron system, question reposted?
Advertisement: https://conwaylife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=4811
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Let's say the first element, notation Sch, is of bonding capacity 1, which means it can bond 1 element (?)
Price? what are you talking about?BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 7:05 am How big is the price of one haul?
I promise to try joining soon.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
I made an agreement with Hunting where he investigates my rules if he can and if he wish in exchange for lots of fun time in Sandbox.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: October 27th, 2020, 7:15 amPrice? what are you talking about?BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 7:05 am How big is the price of one haul?
I promise to try joining soon.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
I saw. Can we talk about the CA now? Do you want more properties?BokaBB wrote: October 27th, 2020, 7:25 am I made an agreement with Hunting where he investigates my rules if he can and if he wish in exchange for lots of fun time in Sandbox.
Have a good day!
BokaBB