Catagolue vandalism

[Ian07]

Currently it's still possible to post comments via the "no rule specified" page: https://catagolue.appspot.com/object/xp0_test

[testitemqlstudop]

Well would you look who's back

Screenshot from 2019-10-09 13-21-46.png (124.29 KiB) Viewed 4173 times

[Moosey]

Look, Uploady the (whichever ordinal you were assigned, or are you UtK?), remember when I wrote this?

I mean, if they’re actually serious about cutting out their jerkiness, that would be great. Considering that they literally created a place to report Catagolue bugs, they could be helpful.
Otherwise, they could still be damaging, though they do have the capacity to be damaging right now, and they’re not using it— maybe we SHOULD trust them, albeit cautiously.

We didn't hate you, but we did view you with some suspicion since you guys did do some damage.
If you guys start being damaging, nobody will like it.
I have a suggestion: what If you actually run some sort of apgsearch (with some identifier attached, like a payoshakey), and then find cool stuff? Everyone will trust you then...

If you need a key or have a complaint, please submit a haul to the catagolue_bugs census
Someone will care.

I guess you guys read the forums, right? I get that sense from what you say

[apg]

The timestamp is 2019-06-24, so the "Well would you look who's back" is slightly misleading.

[Moosey]

The timestamp is 2019-06-24, so the "Well would you look who's back" is slightly misleading.

Still, we need to resolve the issue with DefinitelyAlphanumeric since Catagolue is still in a state that we don't want it to be in... we should attempt to work with them, albeit cautiously, since if they're anything, they're very clever. If we do gain their trust, and they gain ours, then we can perhaps put an end to the disabling of comments.

[testitemqlstudop]

The timestamp is 2019-06-24, so the "Well would you look who's back" is slightly misleading.

... then why did I see the exact same haul in the "recent hauls" page?