Latin vs. Greek.muzik wrote:(honestly why do we have so many words for numbers? we don't call chemical compounds with four oxygen atoms a quadoxide, but a tetroxide, yet we still have quadrillion as opposed to tetrillion...)
Looks like two ships that were not properly separated -- a pseudo-flotilla, if you will.
It affects all rules, even Conway Life. See e.g. xq4_6rucy1cur6zwgggxgggzwfg0h0h0gf.muzik wrote:Yup.
And to think this only affected the non-totalistic rules...
I thought this was a good idea, so here's a patch.drc wrote:Can anybody have apgmera print every new object that appears:
New object: xp2_7
New object: xs4_33
New object: xq4_153
.
.
.
10000 soups completed (99999999 per second)
Code: Select all
diff -Nru apgmera-cffe/main.cpp newobjects-cffe/main.cpp
--- apgmera-cffe/main.cpp 2016-06-30 18:32:21.542207300 +0200
+++ newobjects-cffe/main.cpp 2016-06-30 18:32:09.227785300 +0200
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
#define APG_VERSION "v3.28"
+bool newObjects = false;
+
/*
* Produce a new seed based on the original seed, current time and PID:
*/
@@ -1315,6 +1317,19 @@
}
}
+ if(newObjects) {
+ if(nBlocks && !census["xs4_33"])
+ std::cout << "New object: \033[1;37mxs4_33\033[0m" << std::endl;
+ if(nBlinkers && !census["xp2_7"])
+ std::cout << "New object: \033[1;37mxp2_7\033[0m" << std::endl;
+ if(nBeehives && !census["xs6_696"])
+ std::cout << "New object: \033[1;37mxs6_696\033[0m" << std::endl;
+ if(nGliders && !census["xq4_153"])
+ std::cout << "New object: \033[1;37mxq4_153\033[0m" << std::endl;
+ if(nBoats && !census["xs5_253"])
+ std::cout << "New object: \033[1;37mxs5_253\033[0m" << std::endl;
+ }
+
census["xs4_33"] += nBlocks;
census["xp2_7"] += nBlinkers;
census["xs6_696"] += nBeehives;
@@ -1324,6 +1339,8 @@
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < objlist.size(); i++) {
std::string apgcode = objlist[i];
if ((ignorePathologicals == false) || (apgcode.compare("PATHOLOGICAL") != 0)) {
+ if(newObjects && !census[apgcode])
+ std::cout << "New object: \033[1;37m" << apgcode << "\033[0m" << std::endl;
census[apgcode] += 1;
if (alloccur[apgcode].size() == 0 || alloccur[apgcode].back().compare(suffix) != 0) {
if (alloccur[apgcode].size() < 10) {
@@ -1547,6 +1564,10 @@
return;
}
+ // temporarily turn off reporting of new objects
+ bool oldNewObjects = newObjects;
+ newObjects = false;
+
std::ostringstream ss;
ss << authstring << "\n";
ss << "@MD5 " << stringlist[2] << "\n";
@@ -1583,6 +1604,9 @@
catagolueRequest(ss.str().c_str(), "/verify");
+ // restore reporting of new objects
+ newObjects = oldNewObjects;
+
}
#ifdef USE_OPEN_MP
@@ -1765,6 +1789,8 @@
local_log = atoi(argv[i+1]);
} else if (strcmp(argv[i], "-t") == 0) {
testing = true;
+ } else if (strcmp(argv[i], "-no") == 0) {
+ newObjects = true;
} else if (strcmp(argv[i], "-p") == 0) {
parallelisation = atoi(argv[i+1]);
} else if (strcmp(argv[i], "--rule") == 0) {
Code: Select all
$ cd apgmera-cffe
$ patch -p1 <../apgmera-3.28-newobjects.patch
patching file main.cpp
$
Sure, just think of it as a password. Can't be the same as any key that any other user has come up with, is all.3+4i wrote:It says the payosha256 key "acts as a combined username and password" which confuses me since that would pretty much contradict the whole purpose of a password. Since I'm also asked to specify a displayed name, should I rather treat the key like an actual password? And about the uniqueness, is this only meant in the context of Catagolue?
That's a decent rate. Depending on your CPU you may get a third of an order of magnitude more, perhaps, but even apgmera can't search soups at truly ludicrous speeds. (Yet.)3+4i wrote:Thanks! It's running now. Only about 1600 soups/s though.
Yes:Apple Bottom wrote:I'm curious. Does the presence of this haul mean Catagolue is (in principle) accepting hauls of less than 10k soups now? I seem to recall that used to be an absolute lower limit.
(From here)calcyman wrote:I've modified Catagolue to accept hauls as long as they *either* have 10k soups or 250k objects. Presumably this would make searching B3/S12-ae34ceit much easier?
Good to know. Thanks!Alexey_Nigin wrote:Yes:
(From here)calcyman wrote:I've modified Catagolue to accept hauls as long as they *either* have 10k soups or 250k objects. Presumably this would make searching B3/S12-ae34ceit much easier?
The hyperproductive-rule theory looks like a good one, given the previous message...!Apple Bottom wrote:Catagolue's down again. Slashdotting, out-of-control soup searchers in hyperproductive rules (not me this time!), or random server outage?
Indeed, it's hardly an interesting rule. I even said as much previously, so I'm not sure why there's a renewed interest in it now.dvgrn wrote:The hyperproductive-rule theory looks like a good one, given the previous message...!
Nothing like a rule that's guaranteed to produce at least one big object with every single soup. But it doesn't seem like it would be at all interesting to run. The hauls are just lists of initial states, and nothing ever changes.
