ConwayLife.com

Posted: **March 26th, 2019, 1:34 pm**

Moosey wrote:How awfully convenient:
Code: Select all
x = 58, y = 56, rule = LifeHistory
44.2D4.2D$44.2D4.2D4.A$55.A$55.3A4$44.2D4.2D$44.2D2.2A2D$48.2A2.2A$
52.2A43$3A$2.A$.A!
I suppose there are better ways to synthesize it that hitting a halfblockade with a glider.
Code: Select all
x = 64, y = 47, rule = LifeHistory
62.A$61.A$61.3A34$2D4.2D$2D4.2D4.A$11.A$11.3A4$6.2D$4.2A2D$4.2A2.2A$
8.2A!
There! 5G!
Code: Select all
x = 86, y = 71, rule = LifeHistory
84.A$83.A$83.3A25$20.A$20.A.A$20.2A4$42.A$41.A$41.3A24$2.A$3.A$.3A$2D
3.ADC$2D3.ACD$6.A5$6.2D$6.2D!
It could POSSIBLY be reduced to 4G IF there is a way to turn a halfblockade into something in the path of the excess glider with 1G, but that’s unlikely.

4G seems to be the optimum:

Code: Select all

x = 10, y = 8, rule = B3/S23
bo$2bo$3o4bo$7bobo$7b2o$5bo$6bo$4b3o!

as this is the only 3G synthesis with this bounded ash. For the 4blocks in 8x9 3G is also impossible. It requires at least 4. I think 4G should be sufficient, even though I don't have a synthesis.

Posted: **March 26th, 2019, 7:31 pm**

Code: Select all

x = 38, y = 38, rule = LifeHistory
24.A$22.3A$21.A$21.2A$4.2A12.5B$5.A11.4B$5.A.AB2.B4.6B$6.2AB.3B3.7B$
8.16B$8.17B$9.9B2D6B$8.10B2D6B$6.18B$4.7B2D10B$2.4BC4B2D9B$.5BCBC8B2D
4B$2.4B3C4B2.2B2D3B3.B$3.5BC4B2.7B3.2B$2.10B3.7B3.3B$.4B10.7B3.4B$4B
12.6B4.4B$3B13.7B4.4B2.4B$2B14.6B6.4B.5B$15.6B8.9B$15.6B9.8B$14.8B9.
7B$15.6B8.B2.6B$15.7B5.11B$13.25B$11.B.2B2A11BDB2A6B$10.2A3B2A9B3DB2A
6B$10.2A14BDBD9B$11.15BD11B$9.5B2.B2.2B2.15B$9.2A4.3B7.4B2.7B$10.A4.B
2AB12.7B$7.3A6.2A$7.A!

Is this known?

Edit:
This is on my old account?

Posted: **March 26th, 2019, 7:58 pm**

googleplex wrote:Is this known?

Yes, that's a very old period tripler -- Dieter Leithner, 15 May 1997. It needs a following dependent conduit, and was posted two days after the first dependent conduit was invented.

Code: Select all

! Herschel period tripler
! Every third Herschel passes. The device is based on a 119-step
! conduit by Dave Buckingham. The tripler requires a Herschel conduit
! at its downstream end which does NOT produce a glider in generation
! 21, like the 166-step Herschel translator by Paul Callahan.
! Dieter Leithner, 14 May 1997
....................O...................................
..................OOO...................................
.................O......................................
.................OO.....................................
OO......................................................
.O......................................................
.O.O....................................................
..OO....................................................
................................................O.......
..............................................OOO.......
.............................................O..........
.............................................OO.........
.................................O......................
.................................OOO....................
..O.................................O...................
..O.O..............................OO...................
..OOO...................................................
....O...................................................
......................O..........................OO.....
......................OOO........................OO.....
.........................O..............................
........................OO..............................
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
......................................................OO
...........OO.............OO..........................OO
......OO...OO.............OO............................
......OO................................................
........................................................
........................................................
.....OO.................................................
......O.....OO.....................................OO...
...OOO......OO.....................................O....
...O................................................O...
...................................................OO...

A period quadrupler was included in the same message:

Code: Select all

#C Herschel period quadrupler
#C Every fourth Herschel passes.
#C Dieter Leithner, 15 May 1997
x = 83, y = 38, rule = B3/S23
75bo$73b3o$72bo$72b2o$60bo$60b3o$63bo$62b2o$31bo$30bobo$8bo22bo44b2o$
8b3o65b2o$11bo17b5o$10b2o16bo4bo$27bo2bo$24bo2bob2o13b2o$23bobobo5bo
10b2o$24bo2bo4bobo$27b2o2bo2bo$32b2o$81b2o$53b2o26b2o$53b2o2$o$obo$3o$
2bo75b2o$78bo$79bo$78b2o3$25b2o17b2o$19b2o5bo17b2o$19bobob3o$12b2o7bob
o$12b2o7b2o!

Both of these are well-known. They're collected in the period-multiplier thread among other places. I've added a link to those stamp collections to period multiplier on the LifeWiki.

Posted: **March 26th, 2019, 11:41 pm**

dvgrn wrote:

googleplex wrote:Is this known?

Yes, that's a very old period tripler -- Dieter Leithner, 15 May 1997. It needs a following dependent conduit, and was posted two days after the first dependent conduit was invented.

Code: Select all

! Herschel period tripler
! Every third Herschel passes. The device is based on a 119-step
! conduit by Dave Buckingham. The tripler requires a Herschel conduit
! at its downstream end which does NOT produce a glider in generation
! 21, like the 166-step Herschel translator by Paul Callahan.
! Dieter Leithner, 14 May 1997
....................O...................................
..................OOO...................................
.................O......................................
.................OO.....................................
OO......................................................
.O......................................................
.O.O....................................................
..OO....................................................
................................................O.......
..............................................OOO.......
.............................................O..........
.............................................OO.........
.................................O......................
.................................OOO....................
..O.................................O...................
..O.O..............................OO...................
..OOO...................................................
....O...................................................
......................O..........................OO.....
......................OOO........................OO.....
.........................O..............................
........................OO..............................
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
......................................................OO
...........OO.............OO..........................OO
......OO...OO.............OO............................
......OO................................................
........................................................
........................................................
.....OO.................................................
......O.....OO.....................................OO...
...OOO......OO.....................................O....
...O................................................O...
...................................................OO...

A period quadrupler was included in the same message:

Code: Select all

#C Herschel period quadrupler
#C Every fourth Herschel passes.
#C Dieter Leithner, 15 May 1997
x = 83, y = 38, rule = B3/S23
75bo$73b3o$72bo$72b2o$60bo$60b3o$63bo$62b2o$31bo$30bobo$8bo22bo44b2o$
8b3o65b2o$11bo17b5o$10b2o16bo4bo$27bo2bo$24bo2bob2o13b2o$23bobobo5bo
10b2o$24bo2bo4bobo$27b2o2bo2bo$32b2o$81b2o$53b2o26b2o$53b2o2$o$obo$3o$
2bo75b2o$78bo$79bo$78b2o3$25b2o17b2o$19b2o5bo17b2o$19bobob3o$12b2o7bob
o$12b2o7b2o!

Both of these are well-known. They're collected in the period-multiplier thread among other places. I've added a link to those stamp collections to period multiplier on the LifeWiki.

I was talking about how in its form here, it's just a conduit.

Posted: **March 27th, 2019, 6:49 am**

googleplex wrote:I was talking about how in its form here, it's just a conduit.

Ah, got it, sorry.

There are a lot of suppressed Fx119 variants. Offhand I can't find anywhere that this exact one has been mentioned before. It's a bit bigger and slower to recover than the standard Fx119 option for preceding a dependent conduit:

Code: Select all

#C Fx119c
#C yellow addition is just a minimal dependent-conduit H-to-G
x = 58, y = 46, rule = LifeHistory
27.D$25.3D$24.D$24.2D$7.2A$8.A13.2A$8.A.AB9.B2A2B$9.2AB.3B6.4B$11.7B
2.6B$11.14B$12.15B2.B$11.16B.B2A$9.20B2A$7.20B.2B17.2E$5.4BC18B18.B2E
B$4.5BCBC4B.11B19.4B$5.4B3C4B2.9B.B19.2B$6.5BC4B2.7B3.2B17.3B$5.10B4.
6B3.3B15.5B5.2E$4.4B10.7B3.4B14.6B4.E$3.4B12.6B4.4B13.6B.BE.E$2.4B13.
6B5.4B2.4B3.9B.B2E$2.A2B14.6B6.4B.5B.12B$3.A14.6B8.9B.12B$3A15.6B9.
21B$A16.8B9.19B$18.6B8.B2.19B$18.7B2.B2.26B$16.41B$14.B.2B2A11BDB2A
21B$13.2A3B2A9B3DB2A23B$13.2A14BDBD26B$14.15BD27B$12.5B2.B2.2B2.30B$
12.2A4.3B7.4B2.22B$13.A3.B2AB13.21B$10.3A5.2A16.17B$10.A25.15B$36.14B
$36.14B$36.13B$37.12B$37.11B$39.9B$39.5B.2B$40.4B!

It's definitely possible your version might fit somewhere that the standard suppression doesn't, but the requirement of a dependent following conduit makes it a very rare case.

Posted: **April 11th, 2019, 7:54 pm**

Well, I certainly didn't expect THIS still life to randomly appear while trying to find conduits:

Code: Select all

x = 38, y = 10, rule = LifeHistory
24.3C$2A22.C.C$2A22.C.C$31.2A.A$31.2A.3A$37.A$31.2A.3A$32.A.A$32.A.A$
33.A!

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 7:34 am**

Extrementhusiast wrote:Well, I certainly didn't expect THIS still life to randomly appear while trying to find conduits:
Code: Select all
x = 38, y = 10, rule = LifeHistory
24.3C$2A22.C.C$2A22.C.C$31.2A.A$31.2A.3A$37.A$31.2A.3A$32.A.A$32.A.A$
33.A!

Excluding cleanup, that gives a 10G synthesis for that 16-bit still-life... Nice!

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 8:37 am**

Gamedziner wrote:
Extrementhusiast wrote:Well, I certainly didn't expect THIS still life to randomly appear while trying to find conduits:
Code: Select all
rle
Excluding cleanup, that gives a 10G synthesis for that 16-bit still-life... Nice!

Here's something:

Code: Select all

x = 42, y = 25, rule = LifeHistory
15.2A$14.A2.A$14.A2.A$14.2A.2A$17.A$2A$2A27.2A$22.2A5.A.A$22.2A5.A14$
39.2A$39.A.A$39.A!

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 8:46 am**

Extrementhusiast wrote:Well, I certainly didn't expect THIS still life to randomly appear while trying to find conduits: ...

Interesting!

Gamedziner wrote:Excluding cleanup, that gives a 10G synthesis for that 16-bit still-life... Nice! ...

It seems as if you pasted a RLE for a totally different pattern. It's also odd that when I attempt to quote your message, it doesn't copy the bottom pattern at all.

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 8:51 am**

mniemiec wrote:
Gamedziner wrote:Excluding cleanup, that gives a 10G synthesis for that 16-bit still-life... Nice! ...
It seems as if you pasted a RLE for a totally different pattern. It's also odd that when I attempt to quote your message, it doesn't copy the bottom pattern at all.

That pattern is a signature - gets me every time as well

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 9:17 am**

wildmyron wrote:That pattern is a signature - gets me every time as well

Ah! Anyway, here is a reduced instantiation. 16.1854 from 9 gliders, and 15.479 from 10. (One glider could be removed if the constellation could be made from 3).

Code: Select all

x = 178, y = 33, rule = B3/S23
95bo$93boo$94boo40boo18boo18boo$88bo46bobo17bobo17bobo$89boobbo41bo11b
3o5bo19bo$88boo3boo37booboo12bobbooboo15booboo$bbo25bo63bobo36bobobo
12bobbobobo16boobo$obo25bobo36boo48boo13bo4bo14bo4bo19bo$boo25boo37boo
48boo17boo18boo18boo$4boo25boo12boo48boo$3bobo25bobo11boo48boo$5bo25bo
3$82b3o$84bo$83bo14$72b3o$74bo$73bo!

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 9:32 am**

16.1854 was done in 6G here.

Code: Select all

x = 58, y = 41, rule = B3/S23
34bo$34bobo$34b2o$56b2o$31bobo22b2o$32b2o$32bo4$30b2o$30bobo$30bo26$b
2o$obo$2bo!

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 9:38 am**

That's literally the same reaction: gen 84 of Extrementhusiast vs gen 92 of that synthesis are both 2*pi + TL + block.

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 9:43 am**

testitemqlstudop wrote:That's literally the same reaction: gen 84 of Extrementhusiast vs gen 92 of that synthesis are both 2*pi + TL + block.

Of course! I just inserted a specific 3-glider collision to create a fully-instantiated version of BlinkerSpawn's refinement of Extrementhusiast's synthesis. Many soup-inspired glider syntheses are examples of "art imitating life" - i.e. artificially synthesizing some small natural components near each other, and then letting nature take its course.

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 11:09 am**

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 1:54 pm**

Gustone wrote:and recieved this.
Code: Select all

Holy shillelagh!

Code: Select all

x = 422, y = 37, rule = B3/S23
30b3o3b3o344b3o3b3o$30bobo3bobo344bobo3bobo$30b3o3b3o344b3o3b3o2$9b2o
5b2o33b2o5b2o302b2o5b2o33b2o5b2o$b4obobobo5bobobob4o17b4obobobo5bobobo
b4o286b4obobobo5bobobob4o17b4obobobo5bobobob4o$3obobob2obo3bob2obobob
3o9b2o4b3obobob2obo3bob2obobob3o284b3obobob2obo3bob2obobob3o4b2o9b3obo
bob2obo3bob2obobob3o$o3bobo13bobo3bo9bobo3bo3bobo13bobo3bo284bo3bobo
13bobo3bo3bobo9bo3bobo13bobo3bo$bob3o5b2ob2o5b3obo10b2o5bob3o5b2ob2o5b
3obo286bob3o5b2ob2o5b3obo5b2o10bob3o5b2ob2o5b3obo$b2o21b2o17b2o21b2o
286b2o21b2o17b2o21b2o$b5o15b5o17b5o15b5o286b5o15b5o17b5o15b5o$4b2o15b
2o23b2o15b2o292b2o15b2o23b2o15b2o19$47bo3b3o5b3o3bo290bo3b3o5b3o3bo$
44b2ob5ob2o3b2ob5ob2o284b2ob5ob2o3b2ob5ob2o$42bob2obo5bobobobo5bob2obo
215bo64bob2obo5bobobobo5bob2obo$41bo3bobo3b5ob5o3bobo3bo214b2o62bo3bob
o3b5ob5o3bobo3bo$45b3o5b2o3b2o5b3o217bobo66b3o5b2o3b2o5b3o$42bo2bob3o
13b3obo2bo280bo2bob3o13b3obo2bo$44bo23bo284bo23bo!

Posted: **April 12th, 2019, 4:22 pm**

Posted: **April 20th, 2019, 7:29 am**

While trying to find the smallest way of turning this ship into a double-pi puffer:

Code: Select all

x = 33, y = 22, rule = B3/S23
6b3o15b3o$5bo2bo3bo7bo3bo2bo$4bo3b2ob3o5b3ob2o3bo$3b2ob2obo3b2o3b2o3b
ob2ob2o$2bobobobo2bo2b2ob2o2bo2bobobobo$b2o3bobobo3bo3bo3bobobo3b2o$o
3bobobo5b5o5bobobo3bo$3bo8bobo3bobo8bo$2o9b2o7b2o9b2o$10bobo7bobo$9b2o
11b2o$8bobo11bobo$7b2o15b2o$6bo3bo3bo3bo3bo3bo$10bobob2ob2obobo$6b2o5b
obobobo5b2o$6b4o5bobo5b4o$5b2o2b2o4bobo4b2o2b2o$9bob2ob2ob2ob2obo$12b
obobobobo$10bobobo3bobobo$12bobobobobo!

Code: Select all

x = 33, y = 24, rule = B3/S23
7bo17bo$6b3o15b3o$5b2o4b3o5b3o4b2o$3b2obo2b3o2bo3bo2b3o2bob2o$4bobo2b
obo3bobo3bobo2bobo$b2obobobobo4bobo4bobobobob2o$b2o3bobo4bo5bo4bobo3b
2o$b3obo3bo4bobobo4bo3bob3o$2o9b2obobobob2o9b2o$12bo7bo$9b2obo7bob2o$
10bo11bo$7b2obo11bob2o$7b2o15b2o$7bobobob3ob3obobobo$6b2o3bo3bobo3bo3b
2o$6bo2bo3bobobobo3bo2bo$9b2o4bobo4b2o$5b2o4bo3bobo3bo4b2o$9bob2obo3b
ob2obo$10bobobobobobobo$12bobo3bobo$11bo3bobo3bo$15bobo!

I ended up producing this p26 c/2 ship with a rather large back spark:

Code: Select all

x = 33, y = 28, rule = B3/S23
6b3o15b3o$5bo2bo3bo7bo3bo2bo$4bo3b2ob3o5b3ob2o3bo$3b2ob2obo3b2o3b2o3b
ob2ob2o$2bobobobo2bo2b2ob2o2bo2bobobobo$b2o3bobobo3bo3bo3bobobo3b2o$o
3bobobo5b5o5bobobo3bo$3bo8bobo3bobo8bo$2o9b2o7b2o9b2o$10bobo7bobo$9b2o
11b2o$8bobo11bobo$7b2o15b2o$6bo3bo3bo3bo3bo3bo$10bobob2ob2obobo$6b2o5b
obobobo5b2o$6b4o5bobo5b4o$5b2o2b2o4bobo4b2o2b2o$9bob2ob2ob2ob2obo$12b
obobobobo$10bobobo3bobobo$12bobobobobo$11b2o2bobo2b2o$12b4ob4o3$13b2o
3b2o$13b2o3b2o!

There is not a category for period 26 spaceships in the wiki, so I guess this is new.

Posted: **April 20th, 2019, 7:35 am**

Gamedziner wrote: I ended up producing this p26 c/2 ship with a rather large back spark:

Code: Select all

x = 33, y = 28, rule = B3/S23
6b3o15b3o$5bo2bo3bo7bo3bo2bo$4bo3b2ob3o5b3ob2o3bo$3b2ob2obo3b2o3b2o3b
ob2ob2o$2bobobobo2bo2b2ob2o2bo2bobobobo$b2o3bobobo3bo3bo3bobobo3b2o$o
3bobobo5b5o5bobobo3bo$3bo8bobo3bobo8bo$2o9b2o7b2o9b2o$10bobo7bobo$9b2o
11b2o$8bobo11bobo$7b2o15b2o$6bo3bo3bo3bo3bo3bo$10bobob2ob2obobo$6b2o5b
obobobo5b2o$6b4o5bobo5b4o$5b2o2b2o4bobo4b2o2b2o$9bob2ob2ob2ob2obo$12b
obobobobo$10bobobo3bobobo$12bobobobobo$11b2o2bobo2b2o$12b4ob4o3$13b2o
3b2o$13b2o3b2o!

There is not a category for period 26 spaceships in the wiki, so I guess this is new.

I think that's exactly what Gustone found. He call it "instead, it produces long sparks".

Posted: **April 20th, 2019, 8:01 am**

Hunting wrote:
Gamedziner wrote:There is not a category for period 26 spaceships in the wiki, so I guess this is new.
I think that's exactly what Gustone found. He call it "instead, it produces long sparks".

I'd like to suggest giving a link to your quotation in cases like this, if possible, just to save everyone else a pointless duplicated search. (EDIT: Oops, repaired the broken quote order.)

There are many categories that don't exist in the LifeWiki, for which matching objects are well known. When there are hundreds or thousands of known periods, sizes, shapes, or whatever, it's much easier to keep track of them in a stamp collection or ZIP file, rather than as separate LifeWiki articles. Absence of (LifeWiki) evidence is not evidence of absence -- check the jslife collection and its updates, and the appropriate Golly pattern collection if there is one.

This particular spaceship was originally found by David Bell in 2001:

Date: Mon Apr 30, 2001 6:44am
Subject: Period 26 c/2 spaceship

A slight modification of Paul's new period 78 puffer creates a
period 26 spaceship:

Code: Select all

x = 28, y = 33, rule = B3/S23
6bobo$5bobbo$4boo$3bo3bo$bb3obo$bo15bo$obb4o6bob3o$obbo8bobboo$3ob3o4b
oo3bo$bboo6bo5b3o$5bo3b3oboobbobbo$bbobo3bo9bo3bo$boo4b3o4bo3b6o$bboo
11bo7bobboo$3b5o5boo3b4obobboo$4bobo7b5o3boo$6bo12bobo$4bobo7b5o3boo$
3b5o5boo3b4obobboo$bboo11bo7bobboo$boo4b3o4bo3b6o$bbobo3bo9bo3bo$5bo3b
3oboobbobbo$bboo6bo5b3o$3ob3o4boo3bo$obbo8bobboo$obb4o6bob3o$bo15bo$bb
3obo$3bo3bo$4boo$5bobbo$6bobo!

Posted: **April 20th, 2019, 8:02 am**

Gamedziner wrote:There is not a category for period 26 spaceships in the wiki, so I guess this is new.

The wiki is not meant to contain every type of pattern. Patterns like this are cataloged in pattern collections. This particular spaceship can be found in the jslife-moving collection albeit in a slightly larger form. The form that you posted can be seen in the Golly pattern collection (Life/Spaceships/smallest-low-period.rle).

Posted: **April 20th, 2019, 8:34 am**

dvgrn wrote:
Gamedziner wrote:
Hunting wrote:There is not a category for period 26 spaceships in the wiki, so I guess this is new.
I think that's exactly what Gustone found. He call it "instead, it produces long sparks".

Psst… I think the quote order is reversed.

Sokwe wrote:The wiki is not meant to contain every type of pattern. Patterns like this are cataloged in pattern collections. This particular spaceship can be found in the jslife-moving collection albeit in a slightly larger form. The form that you posted can be seen in the Golly pattern collection (Life/Spaceships/smallest-low-period.rle).

Got it. Sorry for the confusion!

Posted: **April 23rd, 2019, 9:30 am**

Serendipitous rearrangement that actually improves the synthesis of the resulting SL, iron and trans-table:

Code: Select all

x = 8, y = 7, rule = B3/S23
3b2o$2bob3o$2bo4bo$b2o3b2o$bo4bo$2b3obo$o3b2o!

Posted: **May 3rd, 2019, 9:12 am**

Code: Select all

x = 150, y = 335, rule = B3/S23
125bobo$125b2o$126bo5$143bo$141b2o$142b2o36$106bobo38bobo$106b2o39b2o$
107bo40bo5$124bo$122b2o$123b2o36$87bobo38bobo$87b2o39b2o$88bo40bo5$
105bo$103b2o$104b2o36$68bobo38bobo$68b2o39b2o$69bo40bo5$86bo$84b2o$85b
2o36$49bobo38bobo$49b2o39b2o$50bo40bo5$67bo$65b2o$66b2o36$30bobo38bobo
$30b2o39b2o$31bo40bo5$48bo$46b2o$47b2o36$11bobo38bobo$11b2o39b2o$12bo
40bo5$29bo$27b2o$28b2o13$2bo$b3o$5o$2ob3o$b2ob2o17b3o$3bo21bo$23b3o2$
24bo$22b3o$20b3o$21b2o3$b2o$b2o$8b2o$5b5o$3bo4bo$3bo3b3o$2bo4b4o2bo5b
4o$2bobo2bo2b3obo7bo$3bo3b3o2bobo6bobo11bo$8bo4bo21b2o$5bobo9bobo14bob
o$5bobo8b2o2bo$17bobo3b2o$18bo4bo$34bo3$52bo$52b2o$51bobo7$69bo$69b2o$
68bobo!

Could this (27,1)c/72 reaction help?

Posted: **May 3rd, 2019, 11:24 am**

It might.

ConwayLife.com

Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

.

Re: A dirty puffer

.

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries

Re: Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries