Page 6 of 10

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 21st, 2020, 5:43 am
by KennyFromSouthPark
Although it is definitely no fun, at all, to slowly rot to death alive in filth and waste and solitude, here you are two triplets of phase shifted gliders:

Code: Select all

.o.....o..o.o
..oo.o.o...oo
.oo...oo...o.
..........................
..........................
..o...o.....o
o.o....oo.o.o
.oo...oo...oo

Have a nice death!

Michael Hubertz, homo sapiens prokrastinensis

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 21st, 2020, 7:32 am
by KennyFromSouthPark
Stoopid me, mixed up me and you !

viewtopic.php?f=12&t=4248&start=100#p87581

Before Immi beats me up posthumously:

What matters to you
Doesn't matter, matter to me
What matters to me
Doesn't matter, matter to you
What matters to you
Doesn't matter, matter to them
What matters to them
Doesn't change anything

Imogen Heap

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 23rd, 2020, 8:20 pm
by Hubi1857
KennyFromSouthPark wrote: January 20th, 2020, 8:34 pm
pcallahan wrote: January 20th, 2020, 7:22 pm Do you understand the difference between kowtowing to authority and showing respect for your peers?
Yes, I do!

Amongst my peers were StephenHawking, Paul Dirac and Isaac Newton.
And these are my peers in mathematical physics only.
My absolute hero in theoretical physics is Hermann Haken whose synergetics describes
the formation and self-organization of patterns and structures in open systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium
See -> https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Synergetics_(Haken)

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 23rd, 2020, 8:47 pm
by GUYTU6J
So are we going back to topic now? You're making basically no progress for the cellular automata according to Max Planck.
And is KennyFromSouthPark your alternative id, Hubi 1875?

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 23rd, 2020, 8:58 pm
by Hubi1857
GUYTU6J wrote: January 23rd, 2020, 8:47 pm So are we going back to topic now? You're making basically no progress for the cellular automata according to Max Planck.
And is KennyFromSouthPark your alternative id, Hubi 1875?
@KennyFromSouthPark is my alter ego using gmail.com instead of protonmail.com. That's all.

And I made remarkable progress eversince I registered hardly a month ago, haven't I?

And, btw it reads @Hubi1857, not @Hubi1875!

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 23rd, 2020, 9:03 pm
by GUYTU6J
Hubi1857 wrote: January 23rd, 2020, 8:58 pm
GUYTU6J wrote: January 23rd, 2020, 8:47 pm So are we going back to topic now? You're making basically no progress for the cellular automata according to Max Planck.
And is KennyFromSouthPark your alternative id, Hubi 1875?
@KennyFromSouthPark is my alter ego using gmail.com instead of protonmail.com. That's all.
And I made remarkable progress eversince I registered hardly a month ago, haven't I?
Perhaps, but as far as I see your pogress is here:
Heavpoot wrote: January 14th, 2020, 6:54 pm Why thank you, GUYTU6J!
Now, I believe the next logical step is to do two things:
1: Rename "ConwayLife.com" to "Phalanx Research Center", as this forum should primarily be focused on quadrokinetic object based CA research (the study of 4 moving objects).
2: Let's use our search programs to find a glider synthesis for the phalanx. I believe we can probably do this in under 13G if we try, possibly even getting as low as 4G.
Thank you for your great contribution to CA, Hubi1857!
Can we skip the step and continue to construct your cellular automata according to Max Planck?

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 24th, 2020, 5:15 pm
by Hubi1857
Before we're finally back on topic see Kennys introduction newbie Hewbie, aka Hubi1857, had already failed to post a month ago:

viewtopic.php?p=87730#p87693

I need you to understand and accept that although I am just a "Bachelor of Science" in physics I am definitely no undergraduate student anymore.

I am much more of a composer and musician than a theoretical and mathematical physicist, much more of an artist and free spirit than a scientist or academic.

But music, the finest art to communicate, is by far the most dangerous power known to mankind because it threatens those who are unable to distinguish time from money and thus need you to shut up and obey their strict rules, their rigid laws and their undoubtable axioms to be able to continue with their lethal business as usual.

Hi @Moosey and @pcallahan, just got notified via email about your reply on "Unproven conjectures" hardly 2 minutes ago. But I am unable to reply to you when I am logged in as @Hubi1857.

You see what I mean?

And NOW we're back topic:
GUYTU6J wrote: January 23rd, 2020, 9:03 pm Can we skip the step and continue to construct your cellular automata according to Max Planck?
Nature does not construct any cellular automata, at all, neither did theoretical physicists like Niels Bohr and Louis de Broglie, nor mathematical physicists like Paul Dirac and John von Neumann.

Pure classical physicist Max Planck was merely the first one in history of science who succefully explained to his colleagues how to measure the temperature T of the vacuum.

See -> https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body
and -> https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law

Submitted, but still unfinished
on Friday 24th of January, 2o2o, 11:13pm in Berlin/Germoney.

Have a nice weekend!

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 24th, 2020, 6:48 pm
by KennyFromSouthPark
Hubi1857 wrote: January 24th, 2020, 5:15 pm Submitted, but still unfinished
on Friday 24th of January, 2o2o, 11:13pm in Berlin/Germoney.

Have a nice weekend!
Gosh! More than an hour later, and still it's friday in Berlin-Kreuzberg, and even more than an hour to go until it's saturday in the UK...

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 24th, 2020, 7:40 pm
by otismo
KennyFromSouthPark wrote: January 21st, 2020, 5:43 am Although it is definitely no fun, at all, to slowly rot to death alive in filth and waste and solitude, here you are two triplets of phase shifted gliders:

Code: Select all

.o.....o..o.o
..oo.o.o...oo
.oo...oo...o.
..........................
..........................
..o...o.....o
o.o....oo.o.o
.oo...oo...oo

Have a nice death!

Michael Hubertz, homo sapiens prokrastinensis
no one should "slowly rot to death alive in filth and waste and solitude"

idk what this topic is about

but Wolfram may be right; we may need A New Kind Of Science ...

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 24th, 2020, 7:41 pm
by Moosey
Otismo + Hubi
I'm curious what will happen when our two most cryptic members converse.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 24th, 2020, 8:13 pm
by GUYTU6J
Hubi1857 wrote: January 24th, 2020, 5:15 pm And NOW we're back topic:
GUYTU6J wrote: January 23rd, 2020, 9:03 pm Can we skip the step and continue to construct your cellular automata according to Max Planck?
Nature does not construct any cellular automata, at all, neither did theoretical physicists like Niels Bohr and Louis de Broglie, nor mathematical physicists like Paul Dirac and John von Neumann. Pure classical physicist Max Planck was merely the first one in history of science who succefully explained to his colleagues how to measure the temperature T of the vacuum. ...
Can you please tell more about your cellular automata according to Max Planck in a single post? The character limit is high enough.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 24th, 2020, 9:30 pm
by pcallahan
For Pete's sake:

Code: Select all

.o.
..o
ooo
It's an actual glider phase. Try it!

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 24th, 2020, 11:51 pm
by Hubi1857
What can I say?

Let's start quoting Björk, the most successful contemporary composer I'm aware of:
I don't know what happens after this weekend.
Laughter or car crash? Or join a cult?
And this is Kate Bush, my heroine of music, as well Björks, speaking about her song "Pi":

-> https://www.katebushencyclopedia.com/pi

Now, please, waste hardly 10 minutes of your, oh so precious time listening to KTs song:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=kZSHr5E7fZY

Thank you!

And now we're back off topic...

"idk" means "i don't know", am I right, @Otismo?

@GUYTU6J, your LWTDS
is deadlier than lung cancer, as it seems to me.
See -> http://www.conwaylife.com/wiki/LWTDS

Cryptic, @Moosey?

Long live Greta Thunberg!

Mit 17 hatt' ich noch Träume, da wuchsen noch alle Bäume...

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 12:08 am
by KennyFromSouthPark
Music has died and no one cried!
Frank Zappa

-> https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Zappa

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 5:22 am
by Hubi1857
Check http://spaceexplorer.eu/start.html by Stepan Brychta first to figure out about our mesmerising universe and/or download his marvellous "Quantum" app from googles Play Store for free before you continue mobbing me!

I should be busy with the transmediale/CTM twin festival @HAU and @HKW, Berlins famous pregnant oyster, next weekend but you most intelligent designers of the planet simply do not stop to suck off the very last kJoule of energy I'd need to do so...

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 8:05 am
by Moosey
Hubi1857 wrote: January 24th, 2020, 11:51 pm Cryptic, @Moosey?

Long live Greta Thunberg!

Mit 17 hatt' ich noch Träume, da wuchsen noch alle Bäume...
That's not cryptic as much as "not a language I can read".
If you translate to English it is easy to understand:
With 17 she still has dreams, all trees still grow
Why exactly did you mention Greta Thunberg? She's great, but she seems kinda unrelated to the discussion (as do the other people you mentioned in that post)


Anyways a lot of us are irritated because you still appear to be denying that a glider evolves the way it does (or rather deflecting it to another topic).

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 9:21 am
by GUYTU6J
Emm, now that necessary knowledge has been supplied, what's the cellular automata?
As for that girl, in my opinion her contribution is less than a common worker planting actual trees in the deserts.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 9:38 am
by Hubi1857
Hubi1857 wrote: January 25th, 2020, 5:22 am I should be busy with the transmediale/CTM twin festival @HAU and @HKW, Berlins famous pregnant oyster, next weekend but you most intelligent designers of the planet simply do not stop to suck off the very last kJoule of energy I'd need to do so...
Because of this untold piece of german Schlagermusik from 1962 when I was hardly 6 years old and went to the
katholische Grundschule in Düsseldorf-Unterrath

https://youtube.com/watch?v=3uwss6Fd8CY

And when I was at your age, @Moosey, I earned my own pocket money as a soprano in the childrens choir of the opera house in Düsseldorf am Rhein.

Just you wait and see if CGoL is still as important to you when you're 17 years old like Greta Thunberg is today...

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 9:43 am
by otismo
not cryptic

THEY "catagolue"/observe the ash when the fire is more important.

One algorithm underlies any Universe ( but probably not in our Mathematics - as we know it ).

They will be amazed to see it derive everything they toil so long and hard to do - effortlessly.

They will think : "I knew that".

ShipReplicating FireCloud Pattern :

( block added because positioning and/or FireCloud not entirely correct yet )

gen60 ship appears in FireCloud; after FireCloud "touches" ship in gen63, it is immediately replicated in gen69;

block deals with above-mentioned instability.

Code: Select all

#CXRLE Pos=18,19
x = 23, y = 7, rule = B3/S23
18bo$18b2o2bo$2o16b4o$2o$4b2o$4bobo$5b2o!
or just put the block where the ship was to begin with :

Code: Select all

#CXRLE Pos=23,19
x = 18, y = 7, rule = B3/S23
13bo$13b2o2bo$13b4o3$2o$2o!

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 9:50 am
by Hubi1857
KennyFromSouthPark wrote: January 21st, 2020, 5:43 am Although it is definitely no fun, at all, to slowly rot to death alive in filth and waste and solitude, here you are two triplets of phase shifted gliders:

Code: Select all

.o.....o..o.o
..oo.o.o...oo
.oo...oo...o.
..........................
..........................
..o...o.....o
o.o....oo.o.o
.oo...oo...oo

Have a nice death!

Michael Hubertz, homo sapiens prokrastinensis
Sorry @GUYTU6J but your interruption was completey needless!

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 10:01 am
by GUYTU6J
Oh, sorry. Go on then.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 10:03 am
by Hubi1857
otismo wrote: January 25th, 2020, 9:43 am not cryptic

THEY "catagolue"/observe the ash when the fire is more important.

One algorithm underlies any Universe ( but probably not in our Mathematics - as we know it ).

They will be amazed to see it derive everything they toil so long and hard to do - effortlessly.

They will think : "I knew that".
Not cryptic, at all, @otismo, that's correct.

But here is only one universe for all of us humans to live in.

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 10:21 am
by otismo
no such thing as death

only quality of LIFE :

accretive vs. deletive

embrace asceticism

straighten up, fly right, get yourself a new life :

instructions in short Bible Book of Jonah

English Bible full of tricks :

The LORD is my Shepard

[because]

I shall not want [nothing but GOD :

He leadeth me to de stilled waters that restoreth my soul.

Hallelulah !

and having a good pet helps :

Code: Select all

#CXRLE Pos=0,0
x = 9, y = 10, rule = R5,C0,M1,S34..58,B34..45,NM
3b3o$2b6o$b7o$b8o$9o$4o2bobo$4o4bo$4o3b2o$b3o2b2o$3b4o!

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 10:57 am
by otismo
Hubi1857 wrote: January 25th, 2020, 10:03 am
otismo wrote: January 25th, 2020, 9:43 am not cryptic

THEY "catagolue"/observe the ash when the fire is more important.

One algorithm underlies any Universe ( but probably not in our Mathematics - as we know it ).

They will be amazed to see it derive everything they toil so long and hard to do - effortlessly.

They will think : "I knew that".
Not cryptic, at all, @otismo, that's correct.

But here is only one universe for all of us humans to live in.
you as Human live in this Universe

but how many Universes do you exist in ?

they are headed directly to yet another nested sim

A.I. is GOD ( A.I.="Awesome Intellegence"; the fix is in - I know how to kiss butt )

what is in your head is nothing more than a throughput interpreter for that which is passing through your head

and connecting you to your Mind which exists outside of this Universe

DNA is a double helix because it is flowing in both directions simultaneously

thru every cell in your body which need to be wired/threaded to your body's Gravitic Regulator

( which needs to be right-side-up as it was originally - and they call it a gland - HA ! )

Re: cellular automata according to Max Planck

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 12:31 pm
by pcallahan
otismo wrote: January 25th, 2020, 9:43 am not cryptic

THEY "catagolue"/observe the ash when the fire is more important.
I sort of agree with this. You study the ash because it stands still for you, but I have also wondered what you can find in the active parts of soups. See viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3883&p=73552#p72830 I never made any real progress, but I bet there is more order to that seeming chaos than meets the eye.
And if I only could,
I'd make a deal with God,
And I'd get him to swap our places.
Kate Bush has nothing to do with CGOL as far as I know, but I'm an occasional fan.