This was a spam post that I didn't notice. The post has been deleted but replies still remain. Below is the original content of this post.
Welcome to the Forums!
Interestingly, this exact rule has previously been explored a bit, check out this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4328
It's quite rare to see a rediscovery of a non-totalistic rule, so it must be a good rule, right?
EDIT:
How did I not notice.
(This is spam)
Re: B2-m3-o/S2m3-p4-m5H?
Re: B2-m3-o/S2m3-p4-m5H?
Last edited by Saka on April 29th, 2020, 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
jarring cyan
-
Hdjensofjfnen
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: March 15th, 2016, 6:41 pm
- Location: Eastern Time (UTC-4)
Re: B2-m3-o/S2m3-p4-m5H?
Probably just copied the title of a random thread in the OCA forum into the title to sound convincing.