Above user in a nutshell

[Moosey]

Someone who is either right or not right

[fluffykitty]

Someone who said something that is always true assuming the law of excluded middle

[Moosey]

Someone who said something that is always true assuming the law of excluded middle

Someone who is right XOR not right. (Since I said not right, the law of the excluded middle doesn't matter)

[testitemqlstudop]

Someone who is right

[Moosey]

Someone who is right

[PkmnQ]

Someone who enjoys making brain-twisting logic statements in English instead of using logical quantifiers.

Someone who may know that ∀(Posts I make)(Post not final->[∃Post][Post after my post)(Post Not first->[∃Post][Post before my post])
And thus that
∃(Person|Person = me)(Person makes brain-twisting logic statements in English and simple observations in logical quantifiers)

Someone who can be described as the above post describes the user above the above user

Means
∀(Post|post=one in question)∀(User|User∈{Above user,User above above user})(Post describes User)


Can anyone list properties of the relation describes? for instance, x = y && z describes x ⇒ z describes y.

That reminds me of the time I tried to make logic into a language.
Oh, what am I supposed to do again?
Oh yeah, describe the above user. Ok so that’s umm…Moosey.
Someone who…aha, that’s the logician right above in that quote!
Ok, so gotta reference…oh, trend. “Someone who is right” ok, gotta think of something...
Aha, I remember a video!

Someone who is wrong.
What? Let me demonstrate why i’m wrong.
Wrong+Wrong=Right
Right+Right=Wrong
Right=Left+Left+Left
Left=Right+Right+Right

Alright, so we start with right and work backwards.
R
LLL
RRRRRRRRR
RWWWW
RRR
RRLLL
RRRRRRRRRRR
RRRWWWW
RRRRR
RWW
RR
W
See? I’m left! (That is also wrong.)

[Moosey]

Someone whose statement is false; a "double-true" statement is true and so is a "double-false" statement-- that is, two rights make a right, as do two wrongs (unless you're referring to things that are wrong morally of course)
(And yes, I know you're talking about some sort of weird pop-culture stuff but I don't care)

[PkmnQ]

Someo who “Someone who”.

(Also, https://youtu.be/LAJeX3iPVyo)

[Gustone]

Someone who is left

[testitemqlstudop]

A chicken that knows how to type

[PkmnQ]

Someone whose profile picture reminds me of the way WhEaT sometimes needs to do in order to make an oscillator that works.

Code: Select all

x = 7, y = 9, rule = B3/S23
2o$o2b2o$b2obo$2bo$2bo$obob2o$2o2bo$4bobo$5b2o!

[Hdjensofjfnen]

A chicken that knows how to type

Harsh!
And as per custom, someone whose number of posts is currently divisible by both 11 and 17. (561)

[Moosey]

Someone who has an amount of posts divisible by 1

[testitemqlstudop]

Someone who currently has an amount of posts divisible by 1, 2, 3, 7, 21, 25, 50, 75, 100, 300, 700, inclusive or 2100.

[Moosey]

Someone who will now be wrong until I make my 4200th post

[testitemqlstudop]

Someone who is responding to a person that took advantage that there was no rule against editing posts and is hence now wrong.

[Hdjensofjfnen]

Someone who's almost at 1000 posts.

[testitemqlstudop]

Someone who's almost at 1220 posts.

Are we paying attention to user stats now?

[Moosey]

Someone for whom the answer is now no, since I didn't pay attention to user stats in this post

[testitemqlstudop]

Someone who is right

[PkmnQ]

Someone who is 0!

[testitemqlstudop]

Someone whose post is ambiguous:

- are you exclaiming that my age is 0,
- are you stating that my age is 0! = 1,
- are you exclaiming that my post had 0 value,
- are you stating that my post had 1 value,
- are you exclaiming that my post evaluates to 0 (i.e. wrong) ,
- are you stating that my post evaluates to the bitwise NOT of 0 (i.e. right)?
Kind of odd for you to use postfix notation.

[PkmnQ]

Someone whose post is ambiguous:

- are you exclaiming that my age is 0,
- are you stating that my age is 0! = 1,
- are you exclaiming that my post had 0 value,
- are you stating that my post had 1 value,
- are you exclaiming that my post evaluates to 0 (i.e. wrong) ,
- are you stating that my post evaluates to the bitwise NOT of 0 (i.e. right)?
Kind of odd for you to use postfix notation.

Someone who made me realized that my post was ambiguous.
ALso, I meant 0! = 1 and 1 is true and........................................................................................

[Moosey]

Someone who responded to a humorous question in a way that suggested they thought it was serious.

Next time say "someone whose post is ¬false", pkmnQ.

[testitemqlstudop]

Someone who is right