PSA: do not comment on spam posts

[testitemqlstudop]

.

[GUYTU6J]

Ad spam attack again?

[Moosey]

Ad spam attack again?

Yup, dvgrn hasn’t deleted this yet


However, he says we should just keep quiet and not bump threads or stuff reporting spam: just click the repost button instead.

[Macbi]

just click the repost button instead.

Report button, lol

[Moosey]

just click the repost button instead.

Report button, lol

Stupid autocorrect!


I’m not sure exactly why they’d market printers, especially when they have the unusual marketing technique:

If your printer stops working then you need to worry

Probably a hilarious typo.

But it’s true! If your printer stops working then you need to worry

[Moosey]

Not the time for dvgrn to be on break

[Hdjensofjfnen]

just click the repost button instead.

Report button, lol

Oh no! Moosey has betrayed us!

[Moosey]

just click the repost button instead.

Report button, lol

Oh no! Moosey has betrayed us!

I didn’t; autocorrect did

[fluffykitty]

Since when was "repost" more of a word than "report"?

[Moosey]

Since when was "repost" more of a word than "report"?

‾\( °- °)/‾

[PkmnQ]

Since when was "repost" more of a word than "report"?

‾\( °- °)/‾

Did you mean to type MACRONREVERSESOLIDUSLOWLINELEFTPARENTHESISKATAKANALETTERTURIGHTPARENTHESISLOWLINESOLIDUSMACRON

[PkmnQ]

Since when was "repost" more of a word than "report"?

‾\( °- °)/‾

Did you mean to type MACRONREVERSESOLIDUSLOWLINELEFTPARENTHESISKATAKANALETTERTURIGHTPARENTHESISLOWLINESOLIDUSMACRON

(Which means ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)

[fluffykitty]

PSA: do not comment on spam posts

[testitemqlstudop]

Wtf there are TWO spam signature posts JUST TODAY (probably same person given the "Indian" postfix, which is making the problem worse)

Dvgrn: look in general discussion for two bumped ancient threads

[Moosey]

I find this one funny

I think the presence of a (2,1)c/6 knightship is additionally entirely hard to figure. A least for omniperiodicity you can envision finding a quick sign Turner and in this way have the option to assemble oscillators all things considered. Be that as it may, I see no chance to get at all to construct a maximum speed knightship with any sort of innovation. You simply need to trust one shows up.

A Spam Link

They seem to have read up a little but have no idea about sir robin

[testitemqlstudop]

Wtf

As for as I know, none of the Golly developers are considering adding support for Python 3.6.

Excellent information!

(A Spam Link Signature)

[GUYTU6J]

We can create our terminology with the help of glossary about the game of life, Many explanations of many terms, which can create our terminology. So, please give me a reply on my comment. we have nokey games promocode on <a website>, which make you help to play more games

Upon spotting a processed meat bot, do these:
1)(Optional)copy the ad paragraph here if interesting.
2)remote the post with the exclamation mark.
3)(optional)add the user to your foe list.

[Moosey]

Continuing on that topic, that poor naïve spambot.
It doesn't realize that CGoL isn't an online game exactly, or rather, that we wouldn't be interested in its stuff.

We have nokey games promocode on some trash , which make you help to play more games.

[GUYTU6J]

[quote="In 2015, In the thread "apgsearch on Diagonal Symmetries", Aliraza153(spamming in signature)"]The code does work, but so far I've only found quite low-period spaceships with it. If I find anything interesting with it I'll let people know.[/quote]

EDIT:
[quote="In 2015, In the thread "Bit Counts", Whiterose1(spamming in signature)"]Most Life-life rules support some oscillators, but there are a few exceptions. Obviously there must be both birth and death, so B/* is out and so is */S012345678. B0 just confuses me, and anything with B1 just explodes.
Now two living cells diagonally adjacent make a period-2 oscillator in everything from B2/ to B2345678/S02345678, or everything with B2 and without S1. I don't think B2/S1 can have oscillators.
A few minutes work can find a p2 oscillator in almost any B3 rule except B3/S123456. Are there any oscillators in this rule?
What is known about this question? Is there any impossibility proof in a non-obvious case like B3/S123456?[/quote]
Is this the most technical comment that a spambot can write?

[fluffykitty]

Spambots sometimes also copy other posts sometimes

[GUYTU6J]

You have to do editing before posting. It saves your time and after effort. If you believe in build skills then Best [omitted] provides the modern skill of digital marketing which covers topic like, SMO, SEO and lots more.

[testitemqlstudop]

Hi!!!

Barring that, space is filled with random radiation. Given enough time, exposure, and the right or “wrong” location in space, your food would be irradiated beyond usefulness.

Someone doesn't know irony....

[Moosey]

Hi!!!

Barring that, space is filled with random radiation. Given enough time, exposure, and the right or “wrong” location in space, your food would be irradiated beyond usefulness.

Someone doesn't know irony....

It's more funny when it's in context, since it's blatantly unrelated to the previous post, yet is semi-related to the title of the thread--
Is every spaceship edible?

How do we know that there's not a soliton-like spaceship such that any collision between solitons has the same effect as if they passed straight through each other?

That can be one of the reasons why we're only "unusually close to a proof" instead of actually having a proof.

Meanwhile, go ahead and post your soliton spaceship candidates here, and if I can't immediately respond with an example configuration where two of them abjectly fail to pass harmlessly through each other... then I'll send you a nickel instead, with a profile of John Conway on it instead of the usual Jefferson.

Hi!!!

Barring that, space is filled with random radiation. Given enough time, exposure, and the right or “wrong” location in space, your food would be irradiated beyond usefulness.

[Spam link in signature]

It sounds almost like a new person who has no idea that

• GOL is not filled with random radiation.
• We're not talking about rocketships

etc.

[Moosey]

Since we got some new spam, here's a graphic for those who can not locate the report button on a spam post.

(Unless it's not a spam post)

5E607525-7AA2-4FF1-81BD-51B18E7385AA.jpeg (120.23 KiB) Viewed 7660 times

[PkmnQ]

is there a repor button on my own comment?