#C robbed from a laudrypizza03 post on the 5s project
x = 18, y = 18, rule = B2acn3ceqy5cjkr6ck/S12-ei3cy4kny5aijq6ck7cHistory
3BA$B2AB$ABAB12$15.2BD$15.BDB$15.B2D$15.D2B!
Mod is irrelevant. At least to this definition.
Also, 100th post woohoo~!
Why yall so good at life?
-Expert in non-23/3 rules (not really)
phdanielli wrote:
Mod is irrelevant. At least to this definition.
How do you define change in direction, then?
In a pure sense and not the fuzzy ones I can think of like "when it turns".
It will be hard to define when it turns as when the ship changes movement direction given that there isn't going to be a canonical center of the ship.
Last edited by Moosey on July 27th, 2019, 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
κ is measurable iff there is a nontrivial elementary embedding j:V→M (M transitive) with critical point κ
continuous motion of the center of the bounding box without changing polar theta as a vector expression = same direction
otherwise = change in direction
the first generation that forces a change in theta = the moment to calculate if that generation left the previous bounding box calculated in the same manner
Last edited by phdanielli on July 27th, 2019, 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Why yall so good at life?
-Expert in non-23/3 rules (not really)
phdanielli wrote:continuous motion of the center of the bounding box without changing polar theta as a vector expression = same direction
otherwise = change in direction
Very well.
But then even a LWSS is changing direction since its bounding box fluctuates, and thus its center:
lwss does not completely leave it's previous bounding box before changing theta
completely leave means no cells, dead or alive, are under both areas of the previous and current bounding box
ie: both bounding boxes must not overlap anywhere
technically lwss is a diag-diag net-ortho ship
i hope my words are not hurting anyone anywhere despite the seriousness of this topic...i don't want to hurt anybuddy...
Why yall so good at life?
-Expert in non-23/3 rules (not really)
phdanielli wrote:lwss does not completely leave it's previous bounding box before changing theta
completely leave means no cells, dead or alive, are under both areas of the previous and current bounding box
ie: both bounding boxes must not overlap anywhere
There's a fairly easy way to circumvent this issue but I'm not sure you have stated it quite yet:
phdanielli wrote:lwss does not completely leave it's previous bounding box before changing theta
completely leave means no cells, dead or alive, are under both areas of the previous and current bounding box
ie: both bounding boxes must not overlap anywhere
There's a fairly easy way to circumvent this issue but I'm not sure you have stated it quite yet:
x = 14, y = 10, rule = LifeHistory
6.D2.D.3D$5.3D.D.D.D$6.D2.D.3D3$3DCD$2DBDC5B$CDBDC2BD2B$D4C2BD2B$5.5B
!
[[ STOP 10 ]]
phdanielli wrote:
i hope my words are not hurting anyone anywhere despite the seriousness of this topic...i don't want to hurt anybuddy...
The same is true for me. I hope I have not hurt anyone's feelings.
What's the latest definition?
cant skip generations; theta changes cannot be added together since the whole point is to eliminate premature turning
ur doing fine; my feelings are hardened due to previous harassment back in school days, and dont worry i curbed the bullying in my own school
basically the definition is anyship that changes absolute theta at least once and every change happens only after completely disassociating all parts of its bounding box with the previous phase's bounding box qualifies as a zig-zagging ship (direction-direction-...-direction net-direction zig-zag ship; replace direction with actual direction; as many as necessary)
Why yall so good at life?
-Expert in non-23/3 rules (not really)
The torch of 5S has been passed on again, and is now managed by speedydelete. It can be found here. Also check out my program EPE, a tool for searching for patterns in various rulespaces.
AFAIK pions (which carry the residual strong force) are stationary and only move between the protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom, and gluons bind quarks together, so they should move even less.
While gluons are confined within hadrons, they are not stationary. Since they (theoretically) have 0 mass, they move at c. A better name would probably be "electron", "proton", "neutron", or even "atom".
Any sufficiently advanced software is indistinguishable from malice.
x = 40, y = 13, rule = B3678/S34678
bboo13bo$boo12b6o$5o8boob3o$b3obo7b6obboo6bobbo3boo$bbo3bob3obbobb4obb
o4b5ob5o$3bobboo3bobob11oboobb8o$4b10obbob7o3boobb6obo$3bobboo3bobob
11oboobb8o$bbo3bob3obbobb4obbo4b5ob5o$b3obo7b6obboo6bobbo3boo$5o8boob
3o$boo12b6o$bboo13bo!
Just call it a "wickpuffer".
I will call it a "wickpuffer", since I can`t find a pattern of the oscillating "noise", which might be simulating a dirty puffer in a 1dimensional CA (i dunno)
Can anyone prove that this is aperiodic or not?
Non-component: A collision of one or more gliders with a rare still life that produces a different, structurally-unrelated rare. The collision is so specific that it only works on the original still life. Example:
Pseudo-crawler
Some reaction that moves a still-life or oscillator in a way which cannot be used to create gliders out of it, and thus cannot be used to make a caterpillar-like spaceship.
Emphatically nonmagical box: An euphemism for the magic Catagolue box that uploades synthesae to Shinjuku, after a heated argument concerning Freywa in the 17 in 17 thread.
Yes, I made a mistake. Also, box-negator-flip-flops and diamond-negator-flip-flops, exactly what they sound like. The second is a diamond-negator-flip-flop.
The pattern you posted remains a box-negator forever; That was not a requirement to be a box negator.
You literally are disagreeing on the definition of a term with its creator, who said:
