rowett wrote:And is there a process by which one decides which rules should be canonical? What's to stop two different posters both generating a rule called "tlife" with different rule definition?
I guess the process is natural selection, more or less. People tend to avoid doing that because it causes patterns to mysteriously not work in ugly and boring ways -- and everybody can edit their own postings on the forums, so even if someone makes a mistake and re-uses a name, it's always possible to fix the problem later.
Multiple-rules-same-name has happened occasionally with some of the Shapeloop rules, and it's very annoying and hard to figure out sometimes. Mostly it means I stop paying attention to the thread where it happens, and let someone else sort it out.
I don't think it has happened very often for isotropic non-totalistic rules, though, and that's mostly what we want to handle here, not the complicated multistate ones. I think my suggestion is that you should put up a quick post on
Close Life Variants, and just say that anyone who wants their favorite named rule to be supported in LifeViewer, should supply you with the name and the equivalent Hensel-format string.
I bet you'll get a lot of good information that way -- and if a few people say "hlife3, but I don't know what that is in Hensel neighbors2 format", well, that will be easy enough for me or you or somebody else to figure out case-by-case.