^^ For what it's worth, here is my current understanding of the matter:
A "typical rulestring" (such as 'B37e8/S234c7e8') serves as
a definition of the CA rules.
A "rulestring" is a way to define the rules that must be followed by every cell in the universe.
A neighbourhood (such as the
Moore neighbourhood) answers the question
"Which cells are neighbours of a given cell?"
For example, the Moore neighbourhood of the cell at origin (coordinates x=0, y=0) includes the 8 cells with coordinates (0;-1), (1;-1), (1;0), (1;1), (0;1), (-1;1), (-1;0), (-1;-1). The Moore neighbourhood of any other cell can be found by
translation.
In particular, 'B37e8/S234c7e8' is
not a neighbourhood (and it doesn't explicitly mention any neighbourhood either).
However, by convention, "rulestrings" in the same format are used only for defining two-state isotropic CA with Moore neighbourhood.
There is a similar "rulestring" notation for defining two-state isotropic CA with honeycomb neighbourhood on the hexagonal tiling.
In other words, it's incorrect to refer to the "rulestring" as either "moore neighborhood title" or "systematic moore neighborhood".
Neighbourhood of a cell is a different concept.
hotdogPi wrote: March 23rd, 2025, 5:42 pm
confocaloid wrote: March 23rd, 2025, 4:12 pm
WhiteHawk wrote: March 22nd, 2025, 3:01 pm
[...] A name is most certainly not "needed" for this rule, systematic moor neighborhood is enough. [...]
Q: what do you mean by "systematic moor neighborhood" in this context?
systematic = typical INT rulestring rather than a name
moor = obvious typo or autocorrect for Moore
WhiteHawk wrote: March 24th, 2025, 12:32 am
confocaloid wrote: March 23rd, 2025, 4:12 pm
WhiteHawk wrote: March 22nd, 2025, 3:01 pm
[...] A name is most certainly not "needed" for this rule, systematic moor neighborhood is enough. [...]
Q: what do you mean by "systematic moor neighborhood" in this context?
typo and brain fart