There's no need to change the name of this topic. Just "glider destruction" by itself already leads to having way too many easy-to-find solutions.
There's also no need to put such destructions on the wiki. Again, there are way too many examples, neither of them is especially interesting compared to all other examples, and it's easy to rediscover them if/when needed.
The simplified rule of thumb is that, if it is easy to find many examples, then please don't post them.
If you found something that looks like it could be of interest to other people in the local community (i.e. isn't just a typical easy-to-find example), then consider posting it in an already-existing forum thread, for example:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=576 "Thread for your unsure discoveries"
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=279 "Thread For Your Accidental Discoveries"
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1141 "Thread For Your Useless Discoveries"
- instead of creating a new thread. In most cases, one should post in an existing thread instead of starting a new one.
ThePlayzr wrote: May 2nd, 2025, 11:10 pm
[...] ok how about just the smallest known, kind of like the opposite of a glider synthesis? or just put some of them on the fly-by deletion page? also can you at least change the name of this topic to 'glider destruction and fly-by deletion of still lives, oscillators, etc'?
127:1
B3/S234c User:Confocal/R (isotropic CA, incomplete)
Unlikely events happen.
My silence does not imply agreement, nor indifference. If I disagreed with something in the past, then please do not construe my silence as something that could change that.