As it currently stands, unlike in many other wikis I've been a member of, there exists no option to move pages without leaving a redirect behind for non-administrators. This gets incredibly annoying, as moving a page will always create a redirect, which in many cases turns out to be completely useless (even counterproductive) and requires admin action to delete.
Could some user rank be added below administrator for editors that request it that allows for page moves that leave no redirects?
Moving pages in LifeWiki
Moving pages in LifeWiki
Parity Replicator Collection v1.6 is now live - please send all relevant discoveries here.
- Nathaniel
- Site Admin
- Posts: 907
- Joined: December 10th, 2008, 3:48 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Moving pages in LifeWiki
I'm not opposed to letting all "trusted" members of the wiki move pages without leaving a redirect behind. However, does anyone else want to weigh in first, before I make that change? Also, can you give an example of when a "move" redirect is counterproductive (in my mind, we basically always want to leave a redirect behind when moving a page, but I'm sure there are some edge cases that aren't popping into my head).
-
GUYTU6J
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: August 5th, 2016, 10:27 am
- Location: 拆哪!I repeat, CHINA! (a.k.a. 种花家)
- Contact:
Re: Moving pages in LifeWiki
I can tell that at least in these cases the redirect has a chance to be unnecessary: 1)those involving at least one User page, including moving from main to User (example talk on the issue), vice versa (these two), and moving inside User namespace; 2)those between different namespaces in general; 3)those involving a page under RLE or Rule namespace, where the moving is to correct page title for future LifeWiki and/or LifeViewer use.Nathaniel wrote: December 20th, 2021, 4:57 am ...Also, can you give an example of when a "move" redirect is counterproductive (in my mind, we basically always want to leave a redirect behind when moving a page, but I'm sure there are some edge cases that aren't popping into my head).
I don't think we need a special user rank for the purpose; any possible damage would be small and easily fixable (moving back or creating a redirect), so just allow all trusted user to be able to do that is fine.
熠熠种花 - Glimmering Garden
Harvest Moon
2-engine p45 gliderless HWSS gun
Small p2070 glider gun
Forgive me if I withhold my enthusiasm.
Harvest Moon
2-engine p45 gliderless HWSS gun
Small p2070 glider gun
Forgive me if I withhold my enthusiasm.
- Nathaniel
- Site Admin
- Posts: 907
- Joined: December 10th, 2008, 3:48 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Moving pages in LifeWiki
Thanks for the context!GUYTU6J wrote: December 20th, 2021, 5:33 am I can tell that at least in these cases the redirect has a chance to be unnecessary: 1)those involving at least one User page, including moving from main to User (example talk on the issue), vice versa (these two), and moving inside User namespace; 2)those between different namespaces in general; 3)those involving a page under RLE or Rule namespace, where the moving is to correct page title for future LifeWiki and/or LifeViewer use.
I've now made this change. All "trusted" members of the wiki can now move pages without leaving a redirect behind.
Re: Moving pages in LifeWiki
I'm not sure if this is a caching problem but the option to leave a redirect behind doesn't seem to be present.
Parity Replicator Collection v1.6 is now live - please send all relevant discoveries here.
- Nathaniel
- Site Admin
- Posts: 907
- Joined: December 10th, 2008, 3:48 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Moving pages in LifeWiki
Nope, not a caching problem. Rather, it was a "Nathaniel is incompetent" problem.muzik wrote: December 21st, 2021, 12:20 pm I'm not sure if this is a caching problem but the option to leave a redirect behind doesn't seem to be present.
Anyway, fixed now -- now "trusted" members of the wiki can actually move pages without leaving a redirect behind.