Search found 4 matches
- March 17th, 2022, 8:18 am
- Forum: The Sandbox
- Topic: it fell short
- Replies: 5
- Views: 496
it fell short
- September 17th, 2021, 7:43 pm
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: LifeWiki Trusted Account Request Thread - Post requests here
- Replies: 1069
- Views: 579420
Re: LifeWiki Trusted Account Request Thread - Post requests here
hello, please can i attain the trusted flag? i am .H
- September 17th, 2021, 12:54 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: My notation for non-isotropic non-totalistic 2 state moore1 rules
- Replies: 2
- Views: 866
Re: My notation for non-isotropic non-totalistic 2 state moore1 rules
We have MAP strings already, it's both easy to read by a program, and will more probably not cause escape errors when you paste that into a piece of code. Plus, Golly and LifeViewer support it.
I'm aware? Imagine if instead of notation like B3-e/S23, there was a 102 bit string that was ...
- September 7th, 2021, 11:10 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: My notation for non-isotropic non-totalistic 2 state moore1 rules
- Replies: 2
- Views: 866
My notation for non-isotropic non-totalistic 2 state moore1 rules
Here's my thing.
It's fully backwards compatible with regular hensel notation/INT rules/such.
Each of the standard INT transitions has a canonical 0deg unmirrored form,
which is taken to be the angle it's at in THAT table. Yes, you know which one i mean.
m after a transition means it's mirrored ...
It's fully backwards compatible with regular hensel notation/INT rules/such.
Each of the standard INT transitions has a canonical 0deg unmirrored form,
which is taken to be the angle it's at in THAT table. Yes, you know which one i mean.
m after a transition means it's mirrored ...